Nguyen Nam P, Leonardo James M, Karlsson Ulf, Vos Paul, Bullock Laurie, Thomas Patricia, Lepera Pamela, Ludin Adir, Chu Colin, Salehpour Mohammad, Jendrasiak Gordon, Sallah Sabah
Department of Radiation Oncology, Southwestern University, VA North Texas Health Care System, 4500 S Lancaster Road, Dallas, TX 75216, USA.
Anticancer Res. 2002 Nov-Dec;22(6B):3429-35.
Locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) has a poor prognosis when treated with conventional chemotherapy and radiation. New chemotherapy agents like paclitaxel may increase the sensitivity of tumors cells to radiation and potentially improve the outcome. The optimal combination of taxane-based chemotherapy agents and radiation is still unclear. We investigated the feasibility of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent near systemic dose of chemotherapy with radiation. A prospective survey of 29 previously untreated patients with unresectable stage III (15 IIIA, 14 IIIB) NSCLC treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin in combination with radiation was reviewed. The patients received 2 cycles of paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) over 3 hours, days 1, 22; carboplatin at area under the curve (AUC) 6 based on Calvert formula days 1, 22 following completion of the paclitaxel infusion. Following induction chemotherapy, radiation therapy started on day 43 until completion to a tumor dose of at least 5960 cGy. Cycles 3 and 4 of chemotherapy were begun on days 43 and 63, respectively, and consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 i.v. over 3 hours, and carboplatin at AUC 6 following paclitaxel infusion. The response rate, acute toxicity, long-term complications, pattern of failure and survival were evaluated and compared to previous studies in the literature. Two patients were lost to follow-up. The response rate to induction carboplatin/paclitaxel was 52%. An overall response rate (complete and partial responders) of 85% was obtained following chemotherapy and radiation. Grade 3-4 acute side-effects were recorded in 9 patients (31%) and consisted of esophagitis (8 patients) and anemia (1 patient). One patient died from cachexia 3 months following treatment (3.7%). The median survival and 3-year survival were 15 months and 30%, respectively, for the remaining 27 patients at a median follow-up of 11 months. There was no difference in survival between stages IIIA and IIIB at 2 years (IIIA: 22%, IIIB: 31%). Local or regional recurrences and distant metastases developed in 9 patients (33%) and 13 patients (46%), respectively. The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin and radiation for locally advanced non-small cell carcinoma is feasible with acceptable toxicity. The response rate compares favorably with previously reported studies. The decrease of tumor volume following induction chemotherapy allows sparing of the lungs from the toxicity of radiation. However, grades 3-4 esophagitis remain significant. The addition of amifostine may be beneficial in this setting.
局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)采用传统化疗和放疗时预后较差。像紫杉醇这样的新型化疗药物可能会增加肿瘤细胞对放疗的敏感性,并有可能改善治疗结果。基于紫杉烷的化疗药物与放疗的最佳组合仍不明确。我们研究了诱导化疗后序贯近全身剂量化疗与放疗的可行性。回顾了一项对29例先前未接受过治疗的不可切除Ⅲ期(15例ⅢA期,14例ⅢB期)NSCLC患者进行的前瞻性研究,这些患者接受了紫杉醇、卡铂联合放疗。患者在第1天和第22天静脉滴注紫杉醇225mg/m²,持续3小时;在紫杉醇输注完成后的第1天和第22天,根据卡尔弗特公式给予卡铂,曲线下面积(AUC)为6。诱导化疗后,放疗于第43天开始,直至完成,肿瘤剂量至少为5960cGy。化疗的第3和第4周期分别在第43天和第63天开始,包括静脉滴注紫杉醇175mg/m²,持续3小时,以及在紫杉醇输注后给予AUC为6的卡铂。评估了缓解率、急性毒性、长期并发症、失败模式和生存率,并与文献中先前的研究进行了比较。2例患者失访。诱导化疗使用卡铂/紫杉醇的缓解率为52%。化疗和放疗后的总缓解率(完全缓解和部分缓解者)为85%。9例患者(31%)记录到3 - 4级急性副作用,包括食管炎(8例)和贫血(1例)。1例患者在治疗后3个月死于恶病质(3.7%)。其余27例患者的中位随访时间为11个月,中位生存期和3年生存率分别为15个月和30%。ⅢA期和ⅢB期在2年时的生存率无差异(ⅢA期:22%,ⅢB期:31%)。分别有9例患者(33%)出现局部或区域复发,13例患者(46%)出现远处转移。紫杉醇、卡铂和放疗联合用于局部晚期非小细胞癌是可行的,毒性可接受。缓解率与先前报道的研究相比具有优势。诱导化疗后肿瘤体积的减小使肺部免受放疗毒性。然而,3 - 4级食管炎仍然很严重。在此情况下添加氨磷汀可能有益。