• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙胺卡因用于连续脊麻与连续硬膜外麻醉的麻醉及血流动力学效应

Anaesthetic and haemodynamic effects of continuous spinal versus continuous epidural anaesthesia with prilocaine.

作者信息

Reisli R, Celik J, Tuncer S, Yosunkaya A, Otelcioglu S

机构信息

University of Selcuk, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Jan;20(1):26-30. doi: 10.1017/s026502150300005x.

DOI:10.1017/s026502150300005x
PMID:12553385
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To compare, using prilocaine, the effects of continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA) and continuous epidural anaesthesia (CEA) on haemodynamic stability as well as the quality of anaesthesia and recovery in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate gland.

METHODS

Thirty patients (>60 yr) were randomized into two groups. Prilocaine, 2% 40 mg, was given to patients in the CSA group, and prilocaine 1% 150mg was given to patients in the CEA group. Incremental doses were given if the level of sensory block was lower than T10 or if needed during surgery.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure in Group CEA compared with Group CSA (P < 0.01). The decrease in heart rate in Group CSA occurred 10 min after the first local anaesthetic administration and continued through the operation (P < 0.05). The level of sensory anaesthesia was similar in both groups. The times to reach the level of T10 and the upper level of sensory blockade (Tmax) were 18.0 +/- 4.7 and 25.3 +/- 7.0 min in Groups CSA and CEA, respectively, and were significantly longer in Group CEA. The duration of anaesthesia was 76.8 +/- 4min and was shorter in Group CSA (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal or epidural anaesthesia administered continuously was reliable in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate. Continuous spinal anaesthesia had a more rapid onset of action, produced more effective sensory and motor blockade and had a shorter recovery period. Prilocaine appeared to be a safe local anaesthetic for use with either continuous spinal anaesthesia or continuous epidural anaesthesia.

摘要

背景与目的

使用丙胺卡因比较连续脊麻(CSA)和连续硬膜外麻醉(CEA)对接受经尿道前列腺切除术患者血流动力学稳定性、麻醉质量及恢复情况的影响。

方法

30例年龄>60岁的患者被随机分为两组。CSA组患者给予2%丙胺卡因40mg,CEA组患者给予1%丙胺卡因150mg。如果感觉阻滞平面低于T10或手术期间需要,则给予递增剂量。

结果

与CSA组相比,CEA组平均动脉压显著降低(P<0.01)。CSA组心率在首次给予局部麻醉药后10分钟开始下降,并持续至手术结束(P<0.05)。两组感觉麻醉水平相似。CSA组和CEA组达到T10水平和感觉阻滞上限(Tmax)的时间分别为18.0±4.7分钟和25.3±7.0分钟,CEA组明显更长。麻醉持续时间为76.8±4分钟,CSA组更短(P<0.01)。

结论

连续给予脊麻或硬膜外麻醉对接受经尿道前列腺切除术的老年患者是可靠的。连续脊麻起效更快,产生更有效的感觉和运动阻滞,恢复期更短。丙胺卡因似乎是一种安全的局部麻醉药,可用于连续脊麻或连续硬膜外麻醉。

相似文献

1
Anaesthetic and haemodynamic effects of continuous spinal versus continuous epidural anaesthesia with prilocaine.丙胺卡因用于连续脊麻与连续硬膜外麻醉的麻醉及血流动力学效应
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Jan;20(1):26-30. doi: 10.1017/s026502150300005x.
2
Anaesthetic and postoperative analgesic effects of spinal clonidine as an additive to prilocaine in the transurethral resection of urinary bladder tumours.脊髓可乐定作为尿道膀胱肿瘤经尿道切除术利多卡因添加剂的麻醉和术后镇痛效果。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 Aug;19(8):589-93. doi: 10.1017/s0265021502000959.
3
Effects of S(+) ketamine added to bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for prostate surgery in elderly patients.S(+)氯胺酮添加到布比卡因用于老年患者前列腺手术脊髓麻醉的效果。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Mar;21(3):193-7. doi: 10.1017/s0265021504003059.
4
A randomized controlled trial comparing haemodynamic stability in elderly patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia at L5, S1 versus spinal anaesthesia at L3, 4 at a tertiary African hospital.在一家非洲三级医院进行的一项随机对照试验,比较老年患者在L5、S1处接受脊髓麻醉与在L3、4处接受脊髓麻醉时的血流动力学稳定性。
Afr Health Sci. 2015 Jun;15(2):466-79. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v15i2.21.
5
The comparison of levobupivacaine in continuous or single dose spinal anesthesia for transurethral resection of prostate surgery.左旋布比卡因连续或单次剂量蛛网膜下腔麻醉用于经尿道前列腺切除术的比较。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014 Mar-Apr;64(2):89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
6
[Circulatory reactions under spinal anesthesia. The catheter technique versus the single dose procedure].[脊髓麻醉下的循环反应。导管技术与单次给药法]
Anaesthesist. 1997 Jan;46(1):38-42. doi: 10.1007/s001010050369.
7
Plain articaine or prilocaine for spinal anaesthesia in day-case knee arthroscopy: a double-blind randomized trial.用于日间膝关节镜手术脊髓麻醉的普通阿替卡因或丙胺卡因:一项双盲随机试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Feb;102(2):259-63. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen357. Epub 2008 Dec 25.
8
Spinal anaesthesia for ambulatory arthroscopic surgery of the knee: a comparison of low-dose prilocaine and fentanyl with bupivacaine and fentanyl.膝关节镜日间手术的脊麻:低浓度普鲁卡因和芬太尼与布比卡因和芬太尼的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Feb;106(2):183-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq272. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
9
Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study.连续脊髓麻醉与超声引导下腰大肌间隙-坐骨神经联合阻滞用于老年高危患者髋关节置换手术:一项前瞻性随机研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Nov 5;14:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-99. eCollection 2014.
10
[Continuous spinal anesthesia versus continuous epidural anesthesia in surgery of the lower extremities. A prospective randomized study].[连续脊髓麻醉与连续硬膜外麻醉用于下肢手术的前瞻性随机研究]
Reg Anaesth. 1991 Aug;14(5):83-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuous Spinal Anaesthesia for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in High-Risk Patient.连续脊髓麻醉用于高危患者腹主动脉瘤血管腔内修复术
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2015 Apr;43(2):123-5. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2014.24482. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
2
Comparison of unilateral spinal and continous spinal anesthesia for hip surgery in elderly patients.老年患者髋关节手术单侧脊髓麻醉与连续脊髓麻醉的比较。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2013 Oct;7(4):404-9. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.121054.
3
Regional anaesthesia in the elderly: a clinical guide.老年患者区域麻醉:临床指南
Drugs Aging. 2004;21(14):895-910. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200421140-00001.