Burger J W A, van 't Riet M, Jeekel J
Department of General Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Scand J Surg. 2002;91(4):315-21. doi: 10.1177/145749690209100401.
The choice of incision for laparotomy depends on the area that needs to be exposed, the elective or emergency nature of the operation and personal preference. Type of incision may however have its influence on the occurrence of postoperative wound complications. Techniques and features of various incisions are discussed, as well as the incidence of their postoperative complications.
A medline search was conducted identifying prospective randomised trials, as well as retrospective studies with sufficient follow-up, comparing midline, paramedian, transverse and oblique incisions.
Significant differences in wound infection and wound dehiscence rates were not reported. Transverse, oblique and paramedian incisions caused significantly less incisional hernias than midline incisions. However, trials comparing transverse and midline incisions for larger laparotomies did not show significant differences. All four trials comparing lateral paramedian with midline incisions reported incisional hernia rates of 0% after the lateral paramedian incision. Differences with the midline incision were significant.
Transverse or oblique incisions should be preferred for small unilateral operations. The paramedian incision should be used for major elective laparotomies. The use of the midline incision should be restricted to operations in which unlimited access to the abdominal cavity is useful or necessary.
剖腹手术切口的选择取决于需要暴露的区域、手术的择期或急诊性质以及个人偏好。然而,切口类型可能会对术后伤口并发症的发生产生影响。本文讨论了各种切口的技术和特点,以及它们术后并发症的发生率。
进行了一项医学文献检索,确定了前瞻性随机试验以及随访充分的回顾性研究,比较正中切口、旁正中切口、横切口和斜切口。
未报告伤口感染和伤口裂开率的显著差异。横切口、斜切口和旁正中切口导致的切口疝明显少于正中切口。然而,比较大的剖腹手术横切口和正中切口的试验未显示出显著差异。所有四项比较外侧旁正中切口和正中切口的试验均报告外侧旁正中切口后切口疝发生率为0%。与正中切口的差异显著。
对于小型单侧手术,应首选横切口或斜切口。旁正中切口应用于大型择期剖腹手术。正中切口的使用应限于对腹腔进行无限制暴露有用或必要的手术。