血管成形术与溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死：院间转运影响的定量综述 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Angioplasty vs thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative overview of the effects of interhospital transportation.

作者信息

Zijlstra F

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2003 Jan;24(1):21-3. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00693-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00693-0

PMID:12559934

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Angioplasty vs thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative overview of the effects of interhospital transportation.血管成形术与溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死：院间转运影响的定量综述

Eur Heart J. 2003 Jan;24(1):21-3. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00693-0.

[Interhospital transportation for primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: not just a simple taxi ride!].

Ital Heart J Suppl. 2003 Jun;4(6):502-9.

A critical amendment to the meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing thrombolysis with primary angioplasty.对比较溶栓与直接血管成形术的临床试验荟萃分析的一项重要修正。

Eur Heart J. 2003 Oct;24(20):1898; author reply 1898. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.06.006.

Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (PRAGUE-2 trial).急性心肌梗死中行直接血管成形术的长途转运与即刻溶栓治疗对比（PRAGUE-2试验）

Eur Heart J. 2003 Oct;24(19):1798. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.06.001.

Primary angioplasty should be first line treatment for acute myocardial infarction: AGAINST.直接血管成形术不应作为急性心肌梗死的一线治疗方法：反对。

BMJ. 2004 May 22;328(7450):1256-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7450.1256.

Rescue thrombolysis may work even though primary thrombolysis has failed.即使初始溶栓治疗失败，补救性溶栓治疗仍可能有效。

BMJ. 1998 Jul 11;317(7151):147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7151.147.

Angioplasty or thrombolysis for acute infarction?急性梗死采用血管成形术还是溶栓治疗？

Z Kardiol. 1995;84 Suppl 2:1-4.

[Reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction: primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or thrombolysis?].

Medicina (Kaunas). 2004;40 Suppl 1:87-9.

Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study.多中心随机试验：比较将急性心肌梗死患者转运至进行直接血管成形术、即刻溶栓或联合策略（针对就诊于无导管实验室的社区医院的患者）。PRAGUE研究。

Eur Heart J. 2000 May;21(10):823-31. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1993.

Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review.急性心肌梗死的直接冠状动脉血管成形术与静脉溶栓治疗的比较：一项定量综述。

JAMA. 1997 Dec 17;278(23):2093-8.

引用本文的文献

Temporal Trends in Reperfusion Delivery and Clinical Outcomes Following Implementation of a Regional STEMI Protocol: A 12-Year Perspective.实施区域性ST段抬高型心肌梗死（STEMI）治疗方案后再灌注治疗的时间趋势及临床结局：一项12年的观察

CJC Open. 2022 Dec 14;5(3):181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.11.015. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Paramedic-initiated helivac to tertiary hospital for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a strategy for improving treatment delivery times.护理人员启动直升机转运至三级医院进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗：一种改善治疗交付时间的策略。

J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(5):1819-1830. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.45.

Neighborhood Variation in Rate of Revascularization among Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients in New York City.纽约市急性心肌梗死患者血运重建率的社区差异。

Cardiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:348527. doi: 10.4061/2011/348527. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

Assessment of acute myocardial infarction: current status and recommendations from the North American society for Cardiovascular Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology.急性心肌梗死评估：北美心血管成像学会和欧洲心脏病学会的现状和建议。

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jan;27(1):7-24. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9714-0. Epub 2010 Oct 24.

Declining mortality following acute myocardial infarction in the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System.美国退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统中急性心肌梗死后死亡率的下降

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2009 Aug 31;9:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-9-44.

Potential generation of geographical inequities by the introduction of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the management of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.通过引入初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死可能产生的地理不平等现象。

Int J Health Geogr. 2007 Sep 23;6:43. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-6-43.

Expedited transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a program evaluation.用于直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的快速转运：一项项目评估

CMAJ. 2007 Jun 19;176(13):1833-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060902.

Access to revascularization among patients with acute myocardial infarction in New York City--impact of hospital resources.纽约市急性心肌梗死患者的血运重建情况——医院资源的影响

J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6):1085-94. doi: 10.1007/s11524-006-9093-y.

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolytic treatment: long term follow up according to infarct location.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与溶栓治疗：根据梗死部位进行的长期随访

Heart. 2006 Jan;92(1):75-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.060152. Epub 2005 Apr 14.

Transport and centralization of acute coronary syndrome care.急性冠状动脉综合征护理的转运与集中化

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2004 Jul;6(4):292-9. doi: 10.1007/s11886-004-0079-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验