Suppr超能文献

实验室检测的样本采集量。

Specimen collection volumes for laboratory tests.

作者信息

Dale Jane C, Ruby Stephen G

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003 Feb;127(2):162-8. doi: 10.5858/2003-127-162-SCVFL.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Unnecessary tests, inefficient ordering practices, and collection of more blood than is required for testing contribute to iatrogenic anemia in hospitalized patients. Laboratories accredited by the College of American Pathologists are expected to review phlebotomy practices for specimen collection volumes periodically.

OBJECTIVE

To report specimen collection, analytic, and discard volumes for routine laboratory tests and to identify practice variables associated with overcollection and blood wastage.

DESIGN

Clinical laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes laboratory improvement program recorded collection container size, laboratory-defined requested volume, manufacturer-defined analytic volume, and average discard volume for routine complete blood cell counts and electrolyte panels ordered for patients in intensive care units. Participants provided information about their specimen collection, processing, and analytic practices in a questionnaire.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 140 public and private institutions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overcollections for routine collections and for situations in which a reduced volume of specimen is collected, and average discard volume per tube.

RESULTS

Laboratories collected a median of 2.76 mL (or 8.5 times) more than their instrument's analytic volume for routine complete blood cell counts and 1.75 mL (or 12 times) more than their instrument's analytic volume for routine electrolyte panels. For clinical situations in which reduced collection volumes were necessary, overcollection for the same analytes was 0.5 mL (3 times) and 0.44 mL (4.2 times), respectively. The median discard volume was 2.8 mL/tube for complete blood cell counts and 2.0 mL/tube for electrolyte panels. Specimen collection container size was directly associated with overcollections and discard volumes. Instrument analytic volume was not a determinant of blood wastage.

CONCLUSIONS

Most laboratories can decrease collection volumes without compromising the ability of the laboratory to report a reliable and timely result. Use of smaller collection tubes can help reduce blood wastage.

摘要

背景

不必要的检测、低效的医嘱开具行为以及采集超出检测所需血量会导致住院患者医源性贫血。美国病理学家学会认可的实验室应定期审查用于标本采集量的静脉穿刺操作。

目的

报告常规实验室检测的标本采集量、分析量和废弃量,并确定与过度采集和血液浪费相关的操作变量。

设计

参与美国病理学家学会Q-Probes实验室改进计划的临床实验室记录了重症监护病房患者常规全血细胞计数和电解质检测项目的采集容器大小、实验室规定的申请量、制造商规定的分析量以及平均废弃量。参与者通过问卷调查提供了有关其标本采集、处理和分析操作的信息。

地点和参与者

共有140家公立和私立机构。

主要观察指标

常规采集以及采集量减少情况下的过度采集量,以及每管的平均废弃量。

结果

对于常规全血细胞计数,实验室采集的血量中位数比仪器分析量多2.76 mL(或8.5倍),对于常规电解质检测项目,比仪器分析量多1.75 mL(或12倍)。对于需要减少采集量的临床情况,相同分析物的过度采集量分别为0.5 mL(3倍)和0.44 mL(4.2倍)。全血细胞计数的废弃量中位数为每管2.8 mL,电解质检测项目为每管2.0 mL。标本采集容器大小与过度采集量和废弃量直接相关。仪器分析量不是血液浪费的决定因素。

结论

大多数实验室可以在不影响报告可靠及时结果能力的情况下减少采集量。使用较小的采集管有助于减少血液浪费。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验