Morin Pascale, Payette Hélène, Moos Merry-K, St-Cyr-Tribble Denise, Niyonsenga Théophile, De Wals Philippe
CLSC de la Région-Sherbrookoise, Quebec, Canada.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003 Jan;17(1):97-105. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00461.x.
This study validated a measure of pregnancy planning effort based on Miller's conceptual framework in two clinical settings. The questionnaire's main items deal with general behaviour with regard to pregnancy, timing and proception (proception being the reverse of contraception). Values for these three items are added to yield a continuous score ranging from 0 to 12. The study population comprised 448 women of different cultural backgrounds recruited in prenatal, fertility and family planning clinics in Quebec and North Carolina. The results indicate that the internal consistency between the three items pertaining to pregnancy planning was excellent (Cronbach's alpha of 0.83). Test-retest reliability after a 4-week interval was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86 for the planning score. The planning score median for women attending family planning clinics (1.00) was significantly lower than that for those recruited in fertility clinics (11.00), confirming the discriminant ability of the instrument. Path analysis shows that the conceptual model corroborates the observed data and explains 53% of the pregnancy planning variability. In conclusion, this is the first questionnaire specifically designed to assess the intensity of pregnancy planning effort, a potentially important variable in epidemiological studies and clinical practice.
本研究在两种临床环境中,基于米勒的概念框架验证了一种衡量妊娠计划努力程度的方法。该问卷的主要项目涉及妊娠、时机选择和受孕(受孕是避孕的相反行为)方面的一般行为。将这三个项目的得分相加,得出一个从0到12的连续分数。研究人群包括在魁北克和北卡罗来纳州的产前、生育和计划生育诊所招募的448名不同文化背景的女性。结果表明,与妊娠计划相关的三个项目之间的内部一致性非常好(克朗巴赫α系数为0.83)。间隔4周后的重测信度非常好,计划得分的组内相关系数为0.86。计划生育诊所女性的计划得分中位数(1.00)显著低于生育诊所招募女性的得分中位数(11.00),证实了该工具的判别能力。路径分析表明,概念模型与观察数据相符,并解释了53%的妊娠计划变异性。总之,这是第一份专门设计用于评估妊娠计划努力强度的问卷,这是流行病学研究和临床实践中一个潜在的重要变量。