Suppr超能文献

移植物通畅并非腘动脉瘤切除和旁路术后成功的唯一临床预测指标。

Graft patency is not the only clinical predictor of success after exclusion and bypass of popliteal artery aneurysms.

作者信息

Jones W Tracey, Hagino Ryan T, Chiou Andy C, Decaprio Jeffrey D, Franklin Kevin S, Kashyap Vikram S

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Wilford Hall Medical Center, TX 78236, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2003 Feb;37(2):392-8. doi: 10.1067/mva.2003.30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The traditional measure of success after exclusion and bypass of popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) is graft patency. In addition to fate of the bypass, we hypothesize that late outcome after surgical treatment of PAA is influenced by completeness of exclusion.

METHODS

Thirty patients who underwent 41 reconstructions for PAA over a 10-year period were reviewed.

RESULTS

Excluded PAAs were examined with duplex ultrasound scan for size, patency, and patent feeding branches; bypass grafts and native inflow and outflow arteries were examined for patency and size. Thirty-six limbs were available for follow-up (mean follow-up period, 46 +/- 42 months). Only two aneurysms (5.6%) appeared patent on duplex ultrasound scan, but five limbs had patent arterial branches communicating with thrombosed excluded PAAs. PAA diameter decreased from 2.5 +/- 0.8 cm to 1.7 +/- 0.5 cm (P <.0001) in most. However, 12 excluded PAAs (33%) showed significant enlargement from 2.2 +/- 0.9 cm to 2.8 +/- 1.0 cm (P =.002). A quarter of enlarging excluded PAA were associated with new compressive symptoms. Three methods of PAA exclusion were used: proximal and distal ligation with short segment isolation (type 1), proximal and distal ligation with long segment isolation (type 2), and single ligature (type 3). In univariate analysis, type of exclusion significantly influenced late size of excluded PAA (P =.004). Type 1 exclusion was superior to both type 2 and 3 exclusions in producing aneurysm diameter reduction. Type 3 exclusion resulted in aneurysm growth. In addition, excluded aneurysms with visualized feeding branches were associated with significant growth compared with PAAs without feeding branches (P =.006). Graft primary and assisted primary patency rates at 5 years were 86% +/- 9.4% and 92% +/- 7.4%, respectively. Although graft diameter and native donor artery diameter significantly increased, this did not adversely affect graft patency.

CONCLUSION

Enlargement of excluded PAA after surgical treatment can cause compressive symptoms. Exclusion requires adequate vascular isolation to prevent late PAA enlargement, with proximal and distal arterial ligation best performed adjacent to the aneurysm. Vein graft enlargement occurs, but this enlargement does not adversely influence patency.

摘要

目的

腘动脉动脉瘤(PAA)切除和旁路术后传统的成功衡量指标是移植物通畅情况。除了旁路的转归,我们推测PAA手术治疗后的远期结局受切除完整性的影响。

方法

回顾了10年间30例接受41次PAA重建手术的患者。

结果

对切除的PAA进行双功超声扫描,检查其大小、通畅情况及通畅的供血分支;检查旁路移植物以及天然流入和流出动脉的通畅情况和大小。36条肢体可供随访(平均随访期46±42个月)。双功超声扫描显示仅2个动脉瘤(5.6%)通畅,但有5条肢体存在与血栓形成的被切除PAA相通的通畅动脉分支。大多数PAA直径从2.5±0.8 cm降至1.7±0.5 cm(P<0.0001)。然而,12个被切除的PAA(33%)出现显著增大,从2.2±0.9 cm增大至2.8±1.0 cm(P = 0.002)。四分之一增大的被切除PAA伴有新的压迫症状。采用了三种PAA切除方法:近端和远端结扎并短节段隔离(1型)、近端和远端结扎并长节段隔离(2型)以及单结扎(3型)。单因素分析显示,切除类型显著影响被切除PAA的远期大小(P = 0.004)。1型切除在使动脉瘤直径缩小方面优于2型和3型切除。3型切除导致动脉瘤增大。此外,与无供血分支的PAA相比,有可见供血分支的被切除动脉瘤显著增大(P = 0.006)。移植物的一期和辅助一期通畅率在5年时分别为86%±9.4%和92%±7.4%。尽管移植物直径和天然供体动脉直径显著增加,但这并未对移植物通畅产生不利影响。

结论

手术治疗后被切除的PAA增大可引起压迫症状。切除需要充分的血管隔离以防止PAA远期增大,近端和远端动脉结扎最好在动脉瘤附近进行。静脉移植物会增大,但这种增大不会对通畅产生不利影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验