Young Barb
Department of Anesthesiology, Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2003 Jan;21(1):80-5. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2003.50012.
A review of the literature on advanced airway management indicates that the intubating laryngeal-mask airway (ILMA) may be an ideal device for airway control in the rural trauma patient. The ILMA is an advanced laryngeal-mask airway designed to allow oxygenation of the unconscious patient as well as blind tracheal intubation with an endotracheal tube. The ILMA is an easy-to-use airway with a high success rate of insertion, and requires little training. For the rural physician managing a difficult airway in a trauma patient, the ILMA has been found to be reliable and successful when other techniques fail, such as fiberoptic intubation and direct laryngoscopy. The ILMA has also been reported to cause less hemodynamic change and less injury to the teeth and lips than direct laryngoscopy. Further, the ILMA was found to be easier and faster to use with a higher success rate than either the combitube or endotracheal tube for unskilled healthcare providers. Limitations and complications of the ILMA may include aspiration, esophageal intubation, damage to the larynx or other tissues during blind passage of a tracheal tube, and edema of the epiglottis.
一项关于高级气道管理的文献综述表明,插管喉罩气道(ILMA)可能是农村创伤患者气道控制的理想设备。ILMA是一种高级喉罩气道,旨在为无意识患者提供氧合,并通过气管导管进行盲视气管插管。ILMA是一种易于使用的气道,插入成功率高,且所需培训较少。对于在创伤患者中处理困难气道的农村医生而言,当其他技术(如纤维光导插管和直接喉镜检查)失败时,ILMA已被证明是可靠且成功的。据报道,与直接喉镜检查相比,ILMA引起的血流动力学变化更小,对牙齿和嘴唇的损伤也更小。此外,对于非熟练的医护人员来说,发现ILMA使用起来比联合导管或气管导管更容易、更快,成功率更高。ILMA的局限性和并发症可能包括误吸、食管插管、气管导管盲插过程中对喉部或其他组织的损伤以及会厌水肿。