Auer Johann, Berent Robert, Weber Thomas, Maurer Edwin, Punzengruber Christian, Lassnig Elisabeth, Mayr Herbert, Eber Bernd
II. Interne Abteilung mit Kardiologie und internistische Intensivemedizin, Allegmeines Offentliches Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen, Schwestern vom Heiligen Kreuz Wels, Austria.
Herz. 2002 Dec;27(8):772-9. doi: 10.1007/s00059-002-2311-9.
Coronary angiography permits evaluation of coronary artery morphology and coronary pathology. It represents an accurate method of defining stenotic coronary lesions. Chest pain may be caused by coronary artery disease as well as by other cardiac and noncardiac disorders. However, sensitivity of clinical evaluation and noninvasive diagnostic assessment in detection of coronary artery disease is limited. Noninvasive diagnostic strategies give inconsistent results in about 10-30%. Here coronary angiography is regarded as an accurate method for appropriate diagnosis. Ist sophisticated apparatus, cost, and invasiveness necessitate well-considered application of this procedure. Therefore, it appears important to analyze coronary angiograms in patients with the referral diagnosis of "atypical" chest pain with inconsistent noninvasive testing or impossibility to perform noninvasive assessment.
We analyzed records of 1,000 consecutive patients (625 men, 375 women, mean age 63.1 years), who underwent coronary angiography at our institution from January 5, 1998 to May 5, 1998.
49 patients (17 women, 32 men; mean age 59 years) were referred due to "atypical" chest pain. 21 (42.9%, nine women, twelve men) of these 49 patients had normal coronary arteries at angiography. 21 (42.9%) patients showed coronary artery disease with a diameter stenosis > 50%. In seven (14.2%) patients, coronary sclerosis with a diameter stenosis < 50% could be observed. Only five (29.4%) of the 17 women but 16 of the 32 men (50%) had coronary artery disease with a diameter stenosis > 50% (p < 0.01).
In unselected patients referred for coronary angiography due to "atypical" chest pain and inconsistent noninvasive testing or impossibility to perform noninvasive assessment. 42.9% had coronary artery disease with a diameter stenosis > 50%. Angiographic evaluation of symptomatic patients with "atypical" signs and symptoms and inconsistent noninvasive testing seems to be appropriate.
冠状动脉造影可用于评估冠状动脉形态和病理状况。它是一种确定冠状动脉狭窄病变的准确方法。胸痛可能由冠状动脉疾病以及其他心脏和非心脏疾病引起。然而,临床评估和非侵入性诊断评估在检测冠状动脉疾病方面的敏感性有限。非侵入性诊断策略在约10% - 30%的病例中给出不一致的结果。在此,冠状动脉造影被视为一种准确的诊断方法。其精密的设备、成本和侵入性需要对此检查进行慎重应用。因此,对于那些无创检测结果不一致或无法进行无创评估而被转诊诊断为“非典型”胸痛的患者,分析其冠状动脉造影显得很重要。
我们分析了1998年1月5日至1998年5月5日在我们机构接受冠状动脉造影的1000例连续患者(625例男性,375例女性,平均年龄63.1岁)的记录。
49例患者(17例女性,32例男性;平均年龄59岁)因“非典型”胸痛被转诊。这49例患者中,21例(42.9%,9例女性,12例男性)冠状动脉造影显示冠状动脉正常。21例(42.9%)患者显示冠状动脉疾病,直径狭窄>50%。7例(14.2%)患者可观察到直径狭窄<50%的冠状动脉硬化。17例女性中只有5例(29.4%)有直径狭窄>50%的冠状动脉疾病,而32例男性中有16例(50%)有此类疾病(p<0.01)。
在因“非典型”胸痛且无创检测结果不一致或无法进行无创评估而被转诊接受冠状动脉造影的未选择患者中,42.9%有直径狭窄>50%的冠状动脉疾病。对有“非典型”症状体征且无创检测结果不一致的有症状患者进行血管造影评估似乎是合适的。