Suppr超能文献

与无血管重建的关节镜治疗相比,采用月骨血管重建的开放性手术治疗III期Kienböck病。

Open treatment of stage III Kienböck's disease with lunate revascularization compared with arthroscopic treatment without revascularization.

作者信息

Leblebicioğlu Gürsel, Doral Mahmut Nedim, Atay A ö Ahmet, Tetik Onur, Whipple Terry L

机构信息

Division of Hand and Microsurgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Hacettepe Medical School, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2003 Feb;19(2):117-30. doi: 10.1053/jars.2003.50009.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to compare the results of open scaphocapitate fusion and revascularization with the results of arthroscopic scaphocapitate fusion and capitate pole excision.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prospective randomized study.

METHODS

Between April 1997 and January 2000, 16 consecutive patients (5 men and 11 women with a mean age of 31 years [range, 18 to 61]) presenting with Kienböck's disease stage IIIA and stage IIIB were randomized to either open scaphocapitate fusion and lunate revascularization (group I) or fully arthroscopic scaphocapitate fusion and capitate pole excision (group II) groups. Cannulated 3.5-mm ASIF screws were used for the purpose of scaphocapitate fixation in both groups. Operation time, hospital stay, time to fusion, range of wrist motion at final follow-up, grip strength, and return to unrestricted activities of daily living were evaluated at 33 months' follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean operating time (153 v 99 minutes), hospital stay (3.6 v 2.3 days), and return to unrestricted daily activities (15 v 5.8 weeks) were shorter in group II. Average time to radiographically evident fusion was shorter in group I (7.25 weeks v 9 weeks). There was a significant increase in grip strength and in range of motion at final follow-up in both groups, and the final grip strength and range of motion was not different between the groups. There were no major complications in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the number of patients was small and the follow-up period was short, arthroscopic scaphocapitate fusion and capitate pole excision in stage IIIA and IIIB Kienböck's disease resulted in shorter operating time, shorter hospital stay, earlier return to unrestricted daily activities, and equal range of motion and grip strength as compared with open scaphocapitate fusion and lunate revascularization. Determination of specific surgical indications for the benefits of arthroscopic treatment of Kienböck's disease must be analyzed in larger studies.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较开放性舟头状骨融合与血运重建的结果和关节镜下舟头状骨融合及头状骨极切除术的结果。

研究类型

前瞻性随机研究。

方法

在1997年4月至2000年1月期间,16例连续的患者(5例男性和11例女性,平均年龄31岁[范围18至61岁]),患有Kienböck病IIIA期和IIIB期,被随机分为开放性舟头状骨融合及月骨血运重建组(I组)或完全关节镜下舟头状骨融合及头状骨极切除组(II组)。两组均使用3.5毫米空心ASIF螺钉进行舟头状骨固定。在33个月的随访中评估手术时间、住院时间、融合时间、末次随访时腕关节活动范围、握力以及恢复无限制日常生活活动的情况。

结果

II组的平均手术时间(153对99分钟)、住院时间(3.6对2.3天)和恢复无限制日常活动时间(15对5.8周)较短。I组影像学上明显融合的平均时间较短(7.25周对9周)。两组在末次随访时握力和活动范围均有显著增加,且两组之间的最终握力和活动范围无差异。两组均无重大并发症。

结论

尽管患者数量少且随访期短,但与开放性舟头状骨融合及月骨血运重建相比,关节镜下舟头状骨融合及头状骨极切除术治疗IIIA期和IIIB期Kienböck病的手术时间更短、住院时间更短、更早恢复无限制日常活动,且活动范围和握力相当。必须在更大规模的研究中分析确定关节镜治疗Kienböck病益处的具体手术指征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验