Lin Fan, Staerkel Gregg
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania 17822, USA.
Cancer. 2003 Feb 25;99(1):44-50. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11012.
Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of pancreatic lesions has become popular to establish a tissue diagnosis before chemotherapy and/or surgery. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of FNAB have improved as a result of several articles regarding cytologic criteria for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, false-negative and "suspicious for malignancy" rates remain relatively high, in part because of the underdiagnosis of well differentiated adenocarcinoma (WDA). Existing cytologic criteria do not specifically focus on WDA. In this study, the authors attempt to add to, redefine, and test cytologic criteria for WDA of the pancreas in FNAB specimens.
The authors retrospectively reviewed the specimens of 291 consecutive computed tomography-guided FNABs of pancreatic lesions performed at the study institution between 1995 and 1999. The original cytologic diagnoses were confirmed by cell blocks (131), surgical tissue (84), or clinical follow-up. The FNAB specimens were evaluated for the presence of 10 cytologic criteria: 1) anisonucleosis, 2) nuclear membrane irregularity, 3) nuclear crowding/overlapping/three-dimensionality, 4) nuclear enlargement (if there are more than two red blood cells), 5) gap versus confluent cell spacing, 6) hyperchromasia, 7) macronucleoli, 8) mitosis, 9) chromatin clearing, and 10) necrosis.
The original cytologic diagnoses were nondiagnostic in 24 cases, benign in 27, suspicious for malignancy in 15, and malignant in 225. Among the 225 malignant lesions, 74 cases were diagnosed as WDA. Cytologic criteria 1-4 were observed in 92-99% of WDA cases, whereas criteria 5-10 were present in only 7-38% of WDA cases. Six of 15 suspicious and 4 of 27 negative cases were of low cellularity but retrospectively met the cytologic criteria 1-4 for WDA (the diagnosis was confirmed on clinical follow-up).
The diagnosis of pancreatic WDA can be made in FNAB specimens by the observance of anisonucleosis, nuclear membrane irregularity, nuclear crowding/overlapping/three-dimensionality, and nuclear enlargement. Necrosis, chromatin clearing, mitosis, macronucleoli, and hyperchromasia are of limited diagnostic significance because they are commonly absent in pancreatic WDA.
胰腺病变的细针穿刺活检(FNAB)在化疗和/或手术前用于建立组织诊断已变得很普遍。由于几篇关于胰腺腺癌细胞学标准的文章,FNAB的诊断敏感性和特异性有所提高。然而,假阴性率和“恶性可疑”率仍然相对较高,部分原因是高分化腺癌(WDA)的诊断不足。现有的细胞学标准并未特别关注WDA。在本研究中,作者试图补充、重新定义并测试FNAB标本中胰腺WDA的细胞学标准。
作者回顾性分析了1995年至1999年在研究机构进行的291例连续的计算机断层扫描引导下胰腺病变FNAB标本。原始细胞学诊断通过细胞块(131例)、手术组织(84例)或临床随访得以证实。对FNAB标本评估10项细胞学标准的存在情况:1)核大小不一,2)核膜不规则,3)核拥挤/重叠/三维结构,4)核增大(如果有两个以上红细胞),5)间隙与融合细胞间距,6)核染色质过深,7)大核仁,8)有丝分裂,9)染色质清晰,10)坏死。
原始细胞学诊断中,24例为无法诊断,27例为良性,15例为恶性可疑,225例为恶性。在225例恶性病变中,74例被诊断为WDA。WDA病例中92% - 99%观察到细胞学标准1 - 4,而标准5 - 10仅在7% - 38%的WDA病例中出现。15例可疑病例中有6例以及27例阴性病例中有4例细胞数量少,但回顾性分析符合WDA的细胞学标准1 - 4(临床随访证实了诊断)。
通过观察核大小不一、核膜不规则、核拥挤/重叠/三维结构以及核增大,可在FNAB标本中做出胰腺WDA的诊断。坏死、染色质清晰、有丝分裂、大核仁以及核染色质过深的诊断意义有限,因为它们在胰腺WDA中通常不存在。