Bang Oh Young, Joo In Soo, Huh Kyoon, Kim Sun Yong
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Ajou University, Woncheon-dong San 5, Paldal-ku, Suwon, Kyungki-do, 442-749, South Korea.
J Neuroimaging. 2003 Jan;13(1):48-52.
The transcranial Doppler (TCD) findings in symptomatic small deep infarction are not well known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of TCD in striatocapsular small deep infarctions (SSDIs).
The cerebral angiography and TCD findings were analyzed on 100 patients with symptomatic cerebral infarcts on the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of TCD in detecting the MCA lesions were compared between lacunar group (the patients with lacunar syndrome and SSDIs on magnetic resonance image) and nonlacunar group.
Thirty-eight patients were classified as the lacunar group, whereas 62 patients as the nonlacunar group. On angiography, occlusive lesion of MCA was found in 18 of the lacunar group and 24 patients of the nonlacunar group. The degree of MCA stenosis was higher in the nonlacunar group (80.8% +/- 21.2%) than the lacunar group (60.4% +/- 21.6%). The accuracy of TCD for the detection of MCA stenosis was not different between the groups. However, the sensitivity of TCD in the lacunar group was lower (72%) than in the nonlacunar group (88%), and it might have been due to the difference in the degree of MCA stenosis among the groups.
Occlusive lesions of the MCA should be considered as a potential cause of SSDIs. In this respect, TCD may be used for screening candidates for conventional angiography in those patients. High rate of mild-degree stenosis of MCA in patients with SSDIs, however, caused a risk for missing such stenosis on TCD.
症状性小的深部梗死的经颅多普勒(TCD)表现尚不为人熟知。本研究旨在评估TCD在纹状体内囊小的深部梗死(SSDI)中的作用。
对100例大脑中动脉(MCA)区域有症状性脑梗死患者的脑血管造影和TCD表现进行分析。比较腔隙性梗死组(磁共振成像显示有腔隙综合征和SSDI的患者)和非腔隙性梗死组中TCD检测MCA病变的敏感性、特异性和准确性。
38例患者被归为腔隙性梗死组,62例患者归为非腔隙性梗死组。在血管造影中,腔隙性梗死组18例和非腔隙性梗死组24例发现MCA闭塞性病变。非腔隙性梗死组MCA狭窄程度(80.8%±21.2%)高于腔隙性梗死组(60.4%±21.6%)。两组间TCD检测MCA狭窄的准确性无差异。然而,腔隙性梗死组TCD的敏感性(72%)低于非腔隙性梗死组(88%),这可能是由于两组间MCA狭窄程度不同所致。
MCA闭塞性病变应被视为SSDI的潜在病因。在这方面,TCD可用于筛选那些患者进行传统血管造影的候选者。然而,SSDI患者中MCA轻度狭窄的高发生率导致了TCD漏诊此类狭窄的风险。