Waltrip Todd, Lewis Robert, Young Vyvy, Farmer Martin, Clayton Susan, Myers Steven, Gray Laman A, Galandiuk Susan
Price Institute of Surgical Research, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2002 Spring;3(1):5-9. doi: 10.1089/109629602753681104.
Animal studies have shown that continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics is more effective than intermittent dosing. We studied several dosing regimens of cefazolin in humans to determine safety and whether or not adequate serum and tissue antibiotic concentrations could be achieved in patients undergoing cardiac bypass.
A prospective, randomized pilot study was conducted at a university-affiliated teaching hospital over a 2-year period in patients undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass grafting. One hundred and thirty-seven patients were randomized to one of three groups. Group 1 (n = 64) received 1 g of cefazolin intravenously before operation and 1 g intravenously at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass. Group 2 (n = 35) received 2 g of cefazolin intravenously before operation, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of cefazolin at 20 mg/min throughout surgery. Group 3 (n = 38) received 3 g of cefazolin intravenously before operation, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of cefazolin at 15 mg/min throughout surgery. Venous blood and subcutaneous fat samples were obtained from the sternal wound in a subset of 34 patients at incision, 0.25 h, 0.5 h, and 1 h; at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass; and at wound closure. Venous blood was sampled in the recovery room and on postoperative day 1. Cefazolin concentrations in the samples were determined by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography using a C18 column.
Serum cefazolin concentrations were higher for group 3 when compared with group 1 at all six intraoperative intervals (p < 0.02) and for group 2 when compared with group 1 at four of six intraoperative intervals (p < 0.04). When compared with group 1, tissue cefazolin concentrations were higher for group 3 at all intraoperative intervals (p < 0.02). No related toxicity or adverse events were observed.
Cefazolin administered as a large preoperative bolus with continuous intraoperative infusion resulted in higher serum and tissue concentrations when compared with conventional intermittent dosing. Pharmacodynamically, continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics may be superior to intermittent dosing when used for perioperative prophylaxis against wound infection, especially for cases in which the antibiotic is not redosed intraoperatively.
动物研究表明,持续输注β-内酰胺类抗生素比间歇给药更有效。我们研究了头孢唑林在人体中的几种给药方案,以确定其安全性,以及在接受心脏搭桥手术的患者中是否能达到足够的血清和组织抗生素浓度。
在一所大学附属医院进行了一项为期2年的前瞻性随机试点研究,研究对象为首次接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者。137名患者被随机分为三组。第1组(n = 64)在手术前静脉注射1 g头孢唑林,在体外循环结束时静脉注射1 g。第2组(n = 35)在手术前静脉注射2 g头孢唑林,然后在整个手术过程中以20 mg/min的速度持续静脉输注头孢唑林。第3组(n = 38)在手术前静脉注射3 g头孢唑林,然后在整个手术过程中以15 mg/min的速度持续静脉输注头孢唑林。在34例患者的子集在切口时、0.25小时、0.5小时和1小时;体外循环结束时;以及伤口闭合时,从胸骨伤口采集静脉血和皮下脂肪样本。在恢复室和术后第1天采集静脉血。使用C18柱通过反相高效液相色谱法测定样本中的头孢唑林浓度。
在所有六个术中时间点,第3组的血清头孢唑林浓度均高于第1组(p < 0.02),在六个术中时间点中的四个时间点,第2组的血清头孢唑林浓度高于第1组(p < 0.04)。与第1组相比,第3组在所有术中时间点的组织头孢唑林浓度均更高(p < 0.02)。未观察到相关毒性或不良事件。
与传统间歇给药相比,术前大剂量推注并术中持续输注头孢唑林可导致更高的血清和组织浓度。从药效学角度来看,β-内酰胺类抗生素持续输注用于围手术期预防伤口感染时可能优于间歇给药,尤其是在术中未再次给药的情况下。