Suppr超能文献

识别记忆电磁时频数据的多变量时空分析

A multivariate, spatiotemporal analysis of electromagnetic time-frequency data of recognition memory.

作者信息

Düzel E, Habib R, Schott B, Schoenfeld A, Lobaugh N, McIntosh A R, Scholz M, Heinze H J

机构信息

Department of Neurology II, Otto von Guericke University, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2003 Feb;18(2):185-97. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(02)00031-9.

Abstract

Electromagnetic indices of "fast" (above 12 Hz) oscillating brain activity are much more likely to be considerably attenuated by time-averaging across multiple trials than "slow" (below 12 Hz) oscillating brain activity. To the extent that both types of oscillations represent the activity of temporally and topographically separable neural populations, time averaging can cause a loss of brain activity information that is important both conceptually and for multimodal integration with hemodynamic techniques. To address this issue for recognition memory, simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings of explicit word recognition from 11 healthy subjects were analyzed in two different ways. First, the time course of neural oscillations ranging from theta (4.5 Hz) to gamma (42 Hz) frequencies were identified using single-trial continuous wavelet transforms. Second, traditional analyses of amplitude variations of time-averaged EEG and MEG signals, event-related potentials (ERPs), and fields (ERFs) were performed and submitted to distributed source analyses. To identify data patterns that covaried with the difference between correctly recognized studied (old) words and correctly rejected nonstudied (new) words, a multivariate statistical tool, partial least squares (PLS), was applied to both types of analyses. The results show that ERPs and ERFs are mainly displaying those neural indices of recognition memory that oscillate in the theta (4.5-7.5 Hz), alpha (8-11.5), and to some extent in the beta1 (12-19.5 Hz) frequency range. The sources of the ERPs/ERFs were in good agreement with the topography of theta/alpha/beta 1 oscillations in being confined to the anterior temporal lobe at 400 ms and being distributed across temporal, parietal, and occipital areas between 500 and 700 ms. Gamma oscillations covaried either positively or negatively with theta/alpha/beta1 oscillations. A positive covariance, for instance, was detected over left anterior temporal sensors as early as 200-350 ms and is compatible with studies in rodents showing that gamma and theta oscillations emerge together out of the interaction of the hippocampus and the entorhinal and perirhinal cortices. Fast beta oscillations (20-29.5 Hz), on the other hand, did not strongly covary with slow oscillations and were likely to arise from neural populations not adequately represented in ERPs/ERFs. In summary, by providing a more comprehensive description of electromagnetic signals, time-frequency data are of potential benefit for integrating electrophysiological and hemodynamic indices of brain activity and also for integrating human and animal electrophysiology.

摘要

与“慢”(低于12赫兹)振荡的脑电活动相比,“快”(高于12赫兹)振荡的脑电活动的电磁指标在多次试验的时间平均过程中更有可能被显著衰减。鉴于这两种振荡类型都代表了时间和空间上可分离的神经群体的活动,时间平均可能会导致脑电活动信息的丢失,这在概念上以及与血液动力学技术的多模态整合方面都很重要。为了解决识别记忆中的这个问题,我们以两种不同方式分析了11名健康受试者明确单词识别的同步脑电图(EEG)和全脑磁脑电图(MEG)记录。首先,使用单次试验连续小波变换识别从theta(4.5赫兹)到gamma(42赫兹)频率范围的神经振荡的时间进程。其次,对时间平均后的EEG和MEG信号、事件相关电位(ERP)和场(ERF)的幅度变化进行传统分析,并进行分布式源分析。为了识别与正确识别的学习过的(旧)单词和正确拒绝的未学习过的(新)单词之间的差异相关的数据模式,我们将多元统计工具偏最小二乘法(PLS)应用于这两种分析类型。结果表明,ERP和ERF主要显示那些在theta(4.5 - 7.5赫兹)、alpha(8 - 11.5)以及在某种程度上beta1(12 - 19.5赫兹)频率范围内振荡的识别记忆的神经指标。ERP/ERF的来源与theta/alpha/beta 1振荡的地形图高度一致,在400毫秒时局限于前颞叶,在500到700毫秒之间分布在颞叶、顶叶和枕叶区域。Gamma振荡与theta/alpha/beta1振荡呈正相关或负相关。例如,早在200 - 350毫秒时,在左前颞叶传感器上就检测到正相关,这与啮齿动物研究结果一致,表明gamma和theta振荡是海马体与内嗅皮质和梨状周围皮质相互作用共同产生的。另一方面,快速beta振荡(20 - 29.5赫兹)与慢振荡的相关性不强,可能源于ERP/ERF中未充分体现的神经群体。总之,通过提供对电磁信号更全面的描述,时频数据对于整合脑电活动的电生理和血液动力学指标以及整合人类和动物电生理具有潜在益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验