Deren S, Oliver-Velez D, Finlinson A, Robles R, Andia J, Colón H M, Kang S Y, Shedlin M
National Development and Research Institutes, Inc., Center for Drug Use and HIV Research, New York, New York 10010, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2003 Jan;38(1):1-24. doi: 10.1081/ja-120016563.
A dual site project was conducted to assess determinants of injection and sex-related risk behaviors among Puerto Rican drug users. The project focused on injection drug users and crack smokers, and was conducted in East Harlem, NY and Bayamón, PR in 1996-2000. Qualitative methods included ethnographic mapping, focus groups, in-depth interviews, and observations. A survey component (East Harlem, n = 800; Bayamón, n = 400) was also conducted. Procedures to ensure integration of methodologies and comparability of data were developed. This paper describes the qualitative and survey methods used, and presents the comparative HIV risk behaviors. The integration of the two methodologies served multiple functions: each component identified issues to be addressed in the other, enhanced cross-site comparability of data, and assisted in interpretation of findings. The survey data showed high levels of risk behaviors in both communities, with significantly higher levels of risk reported in Bayamón. Conducting studies of similar ethnic groups in different communities provides opportunities to examine diverse sources of influence on risk behaviors. The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods can enhance comparability and understanding of findings, particularly when there are differences in behaviors between communities.
开展了一个双地点项目,以评估波多黎各吸毒者中注射及与性相关的风险行为的决定因素。该项目聚焦于注射吸毒者和快克烟吸食者,于1996年至2000年在纽约州东哈莱姆区和波多黎各的巴亚蒙开展。定性方法包括人种志绘图、焦点小组、深入访谈和观察。还进行了一个调查部分(东哈莱姆区,n = 800;巴亚蒙,n = 400)。制定了确保方法整合和数据可比性的程序。本文描述了所使用的定性和调查方法,并呈现了比较性的艾滋病毒风险行为。两种方法的整合发挥了多种作用:每个部分都确定了对方需要解决的问题,提高了跨地点数据的可比性,并有助于对研究结果进行解释。调查数据显示两个社区的风险行为水平都很高,巴亚蒙报告的风险水平显著更高。在不同社区对类似种族群体进行研究,为考察影响风险行为的多种不同来源提供了机会。定性和定量方法的整合可以提高可比性并增进对研究结果的理解,尤其是当社区之间存在行为差异时。