Hanefeld Markolf, Koehler Carsta, Fuecker Katja, Henkel Elena, Schaper Frank, Temelkova-Kurktschiev Theodora
Centre for Clinical Studies, Gesellschaft für Wissens-und Technologietransfer, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):868-74. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.868.
Isolated impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) are two risk categories for type 2 diabetes. This study compared both categories with respect to the degree of insulin secretion abnormalities and insulin resistance.
This is a crossover comparison of a population at high risk for type 2 diabetes. The subjects were recruited from the Risk Factor in Impaired Glucose Tolerance for Atherosclerosis and Diabetes (RIAD) study. They underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, with measurement of specific insulin, C-peptide, proinsulin, and free fatty acids at baseline and every 30 min after load for 2 h. Factor analysis was performed to evaluate the importance of insulin resistance and secretion abnormalities in both categories.
All categories of prediabetic hyperglycemia had a higher cardiovascular risk factor level when adjusted for sex, age, and BMI compared to control subjects with normal glucose tolerance. Subjects with isolated IFG were more insulin resistant than those with IGT. By contrast, subjects with isolated IGT exhibited a more severe deficit in early- and late-phase insulin secretion versus IFG subjects. As shown with factor analysis, in IFG the insulin resistance factor explained 28.4% of the variance, whereas in IGT the insulin secretion factor was dominant, explaining 31.1% of the total variance.
Our cross-sectional data from the RIAD study demonstrate that isolated IFG and isolated IGT are different with respect to the degree of insulin resistance and anomalies in insulin secretion, and that subjects with IGT exhibit a deficit in the early and late phases of insulin secretion. This finding may be important for a differential approach in primary prevention of type 2 diabetes.
空腹血糖受损(IFG)和糖耐量受损(IGT)是2型糖尿病的两种风险类型。本研究比较了这两种类型在胰岛素分泌异常程度和胰岛素抵抗方面的情况。
这是一项对2型糖尿病高危人群的交叉比较研究。研究对象来自动脉粥样硬化和糖尿病糖耐量受损风险因素(RIAD)研究。他们接受了75克口服葡萄糖耐量试验,在基线时以及负荷后每30分钟测量一次特定胰岛素、C肽、胰岛素原和游离脂肪酸,共测量2小时。进行因子分析以评估胰岛素抵抗和分泌异常在这两种类型中的重要性。
与糖耐量正常的对照受试者相比,在根据性别、年龄和体重指数进行调整后,所有糖尿病前期高血糖类别都有更高的心血管危险因素水平。单纯IFG受试者比IGT受试者的胰岛素抵抗更强。相比之下,单纯IGT受试者在早期和晚期胰岛素分泌方面的缺陷比IFG受试者更严重。如因子分析所示,在IFG中,胰岛素抵抗因子解释了28.4%的方差,而在IGT中,胰岛素分泌因子占主导,解释了总方差的31.1%。
我们来自RIAD研究的横断面数据表明,单纯IFG和单纯IGT在胰岛素抵抗程度和胰岛素分泌异常方面存在差异,并且IGT受试者在胰岛素分泌的早期和晚期存在缺陷。这一发现对于2型糖尿病一级预防的差异化方法可能很重要。