Fuks Anna B, Eidelman Eliezer, Lewinstein Israel
Hebrew University, Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Jerusalem, Israel.
ASDC J Dent Child. 2002 Sep-Dec;69(3):239-42, 233.
The present study compared the shearing strength of a non-rinse conditioning (NRC) compomer sealant to that of a conventional sealant. Thirty molars and premolars were sectioned longitudinally. The resulting halves were divided into 4 groups. Cylinders of sealants were bonded to the sections using a gelatin capsule as a matrix, as follows: Group A (n = 15) NRC + Prime & Bond + Dyract Seal; Group B (n = 15) same as group A but with phosphoric acid and rinse; Group C (n = 15) conventional phosphoric acid + Helioseal; Group D (n = 15) NRC + Helioseal. After immersing the specimens in water for 7 days, the samples were mounted on the Instron testing machine at a 20 mm/min crosshead speed. The results were subjected to ANOVA with Scheffe test, with a significant level of .05. No shearing strength values could be obtained for the specimens of group D. Some cylinders separated from the enamel while still immersed in the water, and in others the adhesion was too low, and no readings could be observed. For all groups, failure occurred at the sealant-enamel interface. The mean value for group A was 5.33 MPa, significantly less than that of groups B 9.12 MPa and C 9.63 MPa (p < 0.006). No significant difference of the mean shear strength was evident between groups B and C. No rinse conditioning with Dyract Seal led to a considerably lower bond strength value than Dyract Seal and Helioseal with phosphoric acid and rinsing.
本研究比较了免冲洗型调拌(NRC)复合体窝沟封闭剂与传统窝沟封闭剂的剪切强度。将30颗磨牙和前磨牙纵向剖开。得到的两半牙齿被分为4组。使用明胶胶囊作为基质,将窝沟封闭剂圆柱体粘结到这些剖面上,分组如下:A组(n = 15)NRC + 底漆与粘结剂 + 戴瑞可特封闭剂;B组(n = 15)与A组相同,但使用磷酸并冲洗;C组(n = 15)传统磷酸 + 贺利氏封闭剂;D组(n = 15)NRC + 贺利氏封闭剂。将标本在水中浸泡7天后,以20毫米/分钟的十字头速度安装在英斯特朗测试机上。结果采用方差分析和谢费检验,显著性水平为0.05。D组标本无法获得剪切强度值。一些圆柱体在仍浸泡在水中时就与牙釉质分离,而在其他情况下,粘结力过低,无法观察到读数。对于所有组,失效均发生在封闭剂与牙釉质界面。A组的平均值为5.33兆帕,显著低于B组的9.12兆帕和C组的9.63兆帕(p < 0.006)。B组和C组之间的平均剪切强度没有明显差异。与使用磷酸和冲洗的戴瑞可特封闭剂及贺利氏封闭剂相比,不使用冲洗的戴瑞可特封闭剂导致粘结强度值显著降低。