Salman Ghassan F, Mosier Michael C, Beasley Brent W, Calkins David R
University of Kansas Medical Center School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kan, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Mar;18(3):213-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20221.x.
To develop a meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
medline, cinhal, and Cochrane Library searches for trials of rehabilitation for COPD patients. Abstracts presented at national meetings and the reference lists of pertinent articles were reviewed.
Studies were included if: trials were randomized; patients were symptomatic with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) <70% or FEV1 divided by forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) <70% predicted; rehabilitation group received at least 4 weeks of rehabilitation; control group received no rehabilitation; and outcome measures included exercise capacity or shortness of breath. We identified 69 trials, of which 20 trials were included in the final analysis.
Effect of rehabilitation was calculated as the standardized effect size (ES) using random effects estimation techniques.
The rehabilitation groups of 20 trials (979 patients) did significantly better than control groups on walking test (ES = 0.71; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.43 to 0.99). The rehabilitation groups of 12 trials (723 patients) that used the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire had less shortness of breath than did the control groups (ES = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.89). Trials that used respiratory muscle training only showed no significant difference between rehabilitation and control groups, whereas trials that used at least lower-extremity training showed that rehabilitation groups did significantly better than control groups on walking test and shortness of breath. Trials that included severe COPD patients showed that rehabilitation groups did significantly better than control groups only when the rehabilitation programs were 6 months or longer. Trials that included mild/moderate COPD patients showed that rehabilitation groups did significantly better than control groups with both short- and long-term rehabilitation programs.
COPD patients who receive rehabilitation have a better exercise capacity and they experience less shortness of breath than patients who do not receive rehabilitation. COPD patients may benefit from rehabilitation programs that include at least lower-extremity training. Patients with mild/moderate COPD benefit from short- and long-term rehabilitation, whereas patients with severe COPD may benefit from rehabilitation programs of at least 6 months.
开展一项荟萃分析,以确定康复治疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的有效性。
检索Medline、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆中有关COPD患者康复治疗的试验。对在全国会议上发表的摘要以及相关文章的参考文献列表进行了审查。
纳入标准为:试验为随机对照试验;患者有症状,且一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)<70%,或FEV1占用力肺活量的百分比(FEV1/FVC)<70%预测值;康复组接受至少4周的康复治疗;对照组未接受康复治疗;结局指标包括运动能力或气短症状。我们共识别出69项试验,其中20项试验纳入最终分析。
采用随机效应估计技术,将康复治疗的效果计算为标准化效应量(ES)。
20项试验(979例患者)的康复组在步行试验中的表现显著优于对照组(ES = 0.71;95%置信区间[95%CI],0.43至0.99)。12项试验(723例患者)采用慢性呼吸系统疾病问卷,其康复组的气短症状少于对照组(ES = 0.62;95%CI,0.35至0.89)。仅采用呼吸肌训练的试验显示康复组与对照组之间无显著差异,而至少采用下肢训练的试验表明,康复组在步行试验和气短症状方面显著优于对照组。纳入重度COPD患者的试验表明,只有当康复计划持续6个月或更长时间时,康复组才显著优于对照组。纳入轻/中度COPD患者的试验表明,无论短期还是长期康复计划,康复组均显著优于对照组。
接受康复治疗的COPD患者比未接受康复治疗的患者具有更好的运动能力,气短症状也更少。COPD患者可能从至少包括下肢训练的康复计划中获益。轻/中度COPD患者从短期和长期康复中获益,而重度COPD患者可能从至少6个月的康复计划中获益。