Bartholomew Terence P, Paxton Susan J
School of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria.
J Law Med. 2003 Feb;10(3):308-24.
In Victoria, Australia, the legal position regarding young people's competence to make medical treatment decisions has not been clarified in legislation, and a number of often vague common law decisions must be relied on for guidance. This situation produces a degree of uncertainty about appropriate professional practice, while also potentially impeding young people's rights claims in health care settings. With this in mind, the present research explored general practitioners' competence and confidentiality decisions regarding a 17-year-old female who presented with symptoms of an eating disorder. Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 500 Victorian general practitioners, of whom 190 responded. After reading a case vignette, general practitioners indicated whether they would find the hypothetical patient competent and if they would maintain her confidentiality. Seventy-three per cent of respondents found the patient competent and most would have maintained confidentiality, at least initially. However, subsequent analysis of the rationales supplied for these decisions revealed a wide diversity in general practitioners' understandings and implementations of extant legal authority. This research highlights the need for general practitioners to be exposed to up-to-date and clinically relevant explanations of contemporary legal positions.
在澳大利亚维多利亚州,关于年轻人做出医疗决策的能力,立法中并未予以明确,必须依据一些往往含糊不清的普通法判决来提供指导。这种情况给适当的专业实践带来了一定程度的不确定性,同时也可能阻碍年轻人在医疗环境中的权利主张。考虑到这一点,本研究探讨了全科医生针对一名出现饮食失调症状的17岁女性所做出的能力和保密决策。向维多利亚州500名全科医生的随机样本发放了问卷,其中190人进行了回复。在阅读一个病例 vignette 后,全科医生表明他们是否会认为该假设患者有能力做出决策,以及他们是否会为她保密。73% 的受访者认为该患者有能力做出决策,并且大多数人至少在最初会为其保密。然而,随后对这些决策所提供的理由进行分析后发现,全科医生对现有法律权威的理解和实施存在广泛差异。这项研究凸显了让全科医生接触当代法律立场的最新且与临床相关解释的必要性。