Nakai Toru, Uno Jun, Ikeda Fumiaki, Tawara Shuichi, Nishimura Kazuko, Miyaji Makoto
Research Center for Pathogenic Fungi and Microbial Toxicoses, Chiba University, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8673, Japan.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Apr;47(4):1376-81. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.4.1376-1381.2003.
The characteristics of in vitro micafungin (FK463) antifungal activity against six species of dimorphic fungi were investigated in accordance with the NCCLS M27-A microdilution methods. MICs of micafungin, amphotericin B, itraconazole, and fluconazole for Histoplasma capsulatum var. capsulatum, Blastomyces dermatitidis, Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, Penicillium marneffei, and Sporothrix schenckii were determined both for the yeast-like form and mycelial form. Coccidioides immitis was tested only in its mycelial form. We have clearly demonstrated that the in vitro activity of micafungin depends considerably on the growth form of dimorphic fungi. Micafungin exhibited potent activity against the mycelial forms of H. capsulatum, B. dermatitidis, and C. immitis (MIC range, 0.0078 to 0.0625 micro g/ml), while it was very weakly active against their yeast-like forms (MIC range, 32 to >64 micro g/ml). Micafungin was also more active against the mycelial forms than the yeast-like forms of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, Penicillium marneffei, and S. schenckii. The MICs of amphotericin B were 2 to 5 dilutions lower for the mycelial forms than for the yeast-like forms of B. dermatitidis and Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. There was no apparent difference in the activity of itraconazole between the two forms. The MICs of fluconazole for the yeast-like forms were generally lower than those for the mycelial forms, and considerably so for B. dermatitidis. These results suggest that the growth form employed in antifungal susceptibility testing of dimorphic fungi can considerably influence the interpretation of results. At present, it cannot be judged whether micafungin has clinical usefulness for dimorphic fungus infections, since for most fungi it remains uncertain which growth form correlates better with therapeutic outcome. However, the results of this study warrant further investigations of micafungin as a therapeutic agent for infections caused by dimorphic fungi.
按照美国国家临床实验室标准化委员会(NCCLS)M27 - A微量稀释法,研究了体外米卡芬净(FK463)对六种双相真菌的抗真菌活性特征。测定了米卡芬净、两性霉素B、伊曲康唑和氟康唑对荚膜组织胞浆菌荚膜变种、皮炎芽生菌、巴西副球孢子菌、马尔尼菲青霉和申克孢子丝菌酵母型和菌丝型的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。粗球孢子菌仅检测其菌丝型。我们已清楚证明,米卡芬净的体外活性在很大程度上取决于双相真菌的生长形式。米卡芬净对荚膜组织胞浆菌、皮炎芽生菌和粗球孢子菌的菌丝型表现出强效活性(MIC范围为0.0078至0.0625μg/ml),而对其酵母型活性非常弱(MIC范围为32至>64μg/ml)。米卡芬净对巴西副球孢子菌、马尔尼菲青霉和申克孢子丝菌的菌丝型也比对酵母型更具活性。两性霉素B对皮炎芽生菌和巴西副球孢子菌菌丝型的MIC比对酵母型低2至5倍稀释度。伊曲康唑在两种形式之间的活性没有明显差异。氟康唑对酵母型的MIC通常低于对菌丝型的MIC,对皮炎芽生菌而言更是如此。这些结果表明,双相真菌抗真菌药敏试验中采用的生长形式可在很大程度上影响结果的解读。目前,由于对大多数真菌而言,仍不确定哪种生长形式与治疗结果的相关性更好,因此无法判断米卡芬净对双相真菌感染是否具有临床实用性。然而,本研究结果值得进一步研究米卡芬净作为双相真菌引起的感染的治疗药物。