Shrager Joseph B, Wain John C, Wright Cameron D, Donahue Dean M, Vlahakes Gus J, Moncure Ashby C, Grillo Hermes C, Mathisen Douglas J
Thoracic Surgical Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Mar;125(3):526-32. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2003.12.
Vascularized, pedicled tissue flaps are often used for cardiothoracic surgical problems complicated by factors that adversely affect healing, such as previous irradiation, established infection, or steroid use. We reviewed our experience with use of the omentum in these situations to provide a yardstick against which results with other vascularized flaps (specifically muscle flaps) could be compared.
A retrospective review was undertaken of 85 consecutive patients in whom omentum was used in the chest. In 47 patients (group I), use of omentum was prophylactic to aid in the healing of closures or anastomoses considered to be at high risk for failure. In 32 patients (group II), omentum was used in the treatment of problems complicated by established infection. In 6 patients (group III), omentum was used for coverage of prosthetic chest wall replacements after extensive chest wall resection.
Overall, omental transposition was successful in its prophylactic or therapeutic purpose in 88% of these difficult cases (75/85). Success with omentum was achieved for 89% of patients (42/47) in group I, 91% of patients (29/32) in group II, and 67% of patients (4/6) in group III. Three patients (3.5%) had complications of omental mobilization. Four patients (4.7%) died after the operation as a result of failure of the omentum to manage the problem for which it was used.
Results with omental transposition compare favorably with published series of similarly challenging cases managed with muscle transposition. Complications of omental mobilization are rare. We believe that its unique properties render the omentum an excellent choice of vascularized pedicle in the management of the most complex cardiothoracic surgical problems.
带蒂血管化组织瓣常用于心胸外科手术中因先前放疗、已存在感染或使用类固醇等因素而愈合受到不利影响的复杂问题。我们回顾了在这些情况下使用大网膜的经验,以便为与其他血管化瓣(特别是肌瓣)的结果进行比较提供一个标准。
对连续85例在胸部使用大网膜的患者进行回顾性研究。47例患者(I组)预防性使用大网膜,以帮助被认为愈合失败风险高的切口或吻合口愈合。32例患者(II组)使用大网膜治疗已存在感染的复杂问题。6例患者(III组)在广泛胸壁切除后使用大网膜覆盖人工胸壁替代物。
总体而言,在这些困难病例中,88%(75/85)的大网膜转位在其预防或治疗目的上取得成功。I组89%(42/47)的患者、II组91%(29/32)的患者和III组67%(4/6)的患者使用大网膜取得成功。3例患者(3.5%)出现大网膜游离的并发症。4例患者(4.7%)术后因大网膜未能解决其使用目的所针对的问题而死亡。
大网膜转位的结果与已发表的用肌肉转位处理的类似具有挑战性病例系列相比具有优势。大网膜游离的并发症很少见。我们认为其独特的特性使大网膜成为处理最复杂心胸外科问题时血管化带蒂瓣的极佳选择。