Bann Simon D, Khan Mansoor S, Darzi Ara W
Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine, 10th Floor QEQM Wing, St. Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY, UK.
World J Surg. 2003 Apr;27(4):390-4. doi: 10.1007/s00268-002-6769-7.
The possibility of using quantitative motion analysis for objective assessment of simple surgical dexterity is investigated using the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD) with qualitative analysis undertaken by inspection. Bench-top knot tying and suturing skills were performed and examined for the ability to discriminate between surgeons of varying experience. These exercises were found to discriminate significantly between junior and senior surgeons in terms of both time taken and the number of movements required. The relation between time and motion was found to be variable depending on what skill was being undertaken: simple suturing, suturing at depth, or knot tying (1.71 vs. 1.86 vs. 2.36; p = 0.002 for 1 vs. 2; p < 0.001 for others). When the number of movements in a minute (standardized movements per minute) were considered, both groups were found to work at a similar rate, depending on the task, implying that the more experienced surgeon is more economical, performing the same exercise with fewer moves rather than with higher speed. Motion analysis exhibits face and construct validity and is a reliable assessment of simple surgical dexterity. Its use for objective assessment of dexterity and competence should be encouraged.
利用帝国理工学院手术评估装置(ICSAD)研究了使用定量运动分析客观评估简单手术操作灵巧性的可能性,并通过检查进行定性分析。进行了台式打结和缝合技能测试,并考察了区分不同经验外科医生的能力。结果发现,这些练习在完成时间和所需动作数量方面能够显著区分初级和高级外科医生。时间与动作之间的关系因所进行的技能不同而有所变化:简单缝合、深部缝合或打结(分别为1.71、1.86和2.36;1与2相比,p = 0.002;其他相比,p < 0.001)。当考虑每分钟的动作数量(标准化每分钟动作数)时,发现两组根据任务以相似的速率工作,这意味着经验更丰富的外科医生更高效,完成相同练习时动作更少而非速度更快。运动分析具有表面效度和结构效度,是对简单手术操作灵巧性的可靠评估。应鼓励将其用于客观评估灵巧性和能力。