Suppr超能文献

雪佛龙公司诉埃查扎巴尔案:针对不利就业行为的“自我威胁”抗辩所引发的公共卫生问题。

Chevron v Echazabal: public health issues raised by the "threat-to-self" defense to adverse employment actions.

作者信息

Barnes Mark, Cleaveland Kimberlee A, Florencio Patrik S

机构信息

Ropes & Gray, Health Care Group, New York, NY 10022, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):536-40. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.536.

Abstract

In June of 2002, the US Supreme Court upheld a regulation that allows employers, under the Americans with Disabilities Act, to make disability-related employment decisions based on risks to an employee's own personal health or safety. Previous judicial decisions had allowed employers to make employment decisions based on the threat that a worker's medical condition posed to others but had not addressed the issue of risk posed to an employee's health by his or her own disability. The authors comment on the potential effects of the court's decision for occupational health practitioners charged with assessing the degree of risk and harm of a particular workplace environment and for public health efforts aimed at curbing workplace injury and sickness.

摘要

2002年6月,美国最高法院维持了一项规定,该规定允许雇主根据《美国残疾人法案》,基于对员工自身个人健康或安全的风险做出与残疾相关的就业决定。此前的司法判决允许雇主基于员工的健康状况对他人构成的威胁做出就业决定,但未涉及员工自身残疾对其健康造成的风险问题。作者评论了该法院判决对负责评估特定工作场所环境的风险程度和危害的职业健康从业者以及旨在遏制工作场所伤害和疾病的公共卫生工作可能产生的影响。

相似文献

2
Chevron v Echazabal: protection, opportunity, and paternalism.
Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):545-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.545.
3
Workers' liberty, workers' welfare: the Supreme Court speaks on the rights of disabled employees.
Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):540-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.540.
5
The Americans with Disabilities Act: disabled by court decisions.
Neurology. 2007 May 15;68(20):1733-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000261921.64814.d1.
6
Supreme court agrees to define employer.
Case Manager. 2003 Jan-Feb;14(1):30-2. doi: 10.1067/mcm.2003.8.
7
Participatory workplace wellness programs: reward, penalty, and regulatory conflict.
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):301-18. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12123.
8
The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1990 Winter;15(4):919-28. doi: 10.1215/03616878-15-4-919.
9
Fetal protection and freedom of contract.
Public Aff Q. 1992 Jul;6(3):305-26.
10
The Americans with Disabilities Act at 25: the highest expression of American values.
JAMA. 2015 Jun 9;313(22):2231-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6405.

本文引用的文献

2
Genetic information and the workplace: legislative approaches and policy changes.
Science. 1997 Mar 21;275(5307):1755-7. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5307.1755.
3
Genetic discrimination: perspectives of consumers.
Science. 1996 Oct 25;274(5287):621-4. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5287.621.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验