Wang Chao-Hung, Leung Nathalie, Lapointe Nathalie, Szeto Linda, Uffelman Kristine D, Giacca Adria, Rouleau Jean L, Lewis Gary F
Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Toronto General Hospital and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Circulation. 2003 Apr 15;107(14):1923-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000062646.09566.CC. Epub 2003 Mar 31.
ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) improve insulin resistance and prevent type 2 diabetes, possibly mediated by inhibition of bradykinin (BK) degradation. The vasopeptidase inhibitor omapatrilat (OMA) raises BK to a greater extent than ACEIs by dual enzyme inhibition, whereas its insulin-sensitizing effects and mechanisms have not been investigated.
We compared the insulin-sensitizing effects of OMA, ramipril (an ACEI), losartan (an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker), and placebo by 2-step euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp in insulin-resistant Zucker fatty rats (n=6 to 7 in each group). OMA resulted in a lower rate of endogenous glucose production than placebo at baseline (35+/-5 versus 54+/-4 mmol x kg(-1) x min(-1), P<0.01), greater suppression of endogenous glucose production by low-dose insulin (73+/-11% versus 27+/-18%, P<0.05), and greater glucose disposal at high-dose insulin (135+/-5 versus 92+/-4 mmol x kg(-1) x min(-1), P<0.01). Ramipril tended to improve insulin sensitivity, but losartan did not. OMA significantly increased 2-deoxyglucose uptake by myocardium, fat, and skeletal muscle. Ramipril increased 2-deoxyglucose uptake only by some skeletal muscles, but losartan did not. The insulin-sensitizing effects of OMA were blocked significantly by HOE-140 (a BK, B2 receptor antagonist) and NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor) in all tissues except myocardium.
OMA induces profound insulin sensitization and increases myocardial glucose uptake in Zucker fatty rats. This effect is greater than that of ramipril and probably occurs at least in part via stimulation of the B2 receptor. OMA has the potential for greater type 2 diabetes prevention than ACEI.
血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)可改善胰岛素抵抗并预防2型糖尿病,可能是通过抑制缓激肽(BK)降解来介导的。血管肽酶抑制剂奥美帕替拉(OMA)通过双重酶抑制作用比ACEIs更能提高BK水平,但其胰岛素增敏作用及其机制尚未得到研究。
我们在胰岛素抵抗的Zucker肥胖大鼠(每组n = 6至7只)中,通过两步正常血糖高胰岛素钳夹技术比较了OMA、雷米普利(一种ACEI)、氯沙坦(一种血管紧张素II 1型受体阻滞剂)和安慰剂的胰岛素增敏作用。在基线时,OMA导致内源性葡萄糖生成率低于安慰剂(35±5对54±4 mmol·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹,P<0.01),低剂量胰岛素对内源性葡萄糖生成的抑制作用更强(73±11%对27±18%,P<0.05),高剂量胰岛素时的葡萄糖处置能力更强(135±5对92±4 mmol·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹,P<0.01)。雷米普利倾向于改善胰岛素敏感性,但氯沙坦则不然。OMA显著增加心肌、脂肪和骨骼肌对2-脱氧葡萄糖的摄取。雷米普利仅增加部分骨骼肌对2-脱氧葡萄糖的摄取,而氯沙坦则无此作用。除心肌外,HOE-140(一种BK B2受体拮抗剂)和NG-硝基-L-精氨酸甲酯(一种一氧化氮合酶抑制剂)在所有组织中均显著阻断了OMA的胰岛素增敏作用。
OMA可在Zucker肥胖大鼠中诱导显著的胰岛素增敏作用并增加心肌葡萄糖摄取。这种作用比雷米普利更强,且可能至少部分通过刺激B2受体发生。与ACEI相比,OMA在预防2型糖尿病方面具有更大的潜力。