Suppr超能文献

GDx的敏感性和特异性:标准打印结果与数值的临床判断

Sensitivity and specificity of the GDx: clinical judgment of standard printouts versus the number.

作者信息

Colen Thomas P, Lemij Hans G

机构信息

Glaucoma Service, The Rotterdam Eye Hospital, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2003 Apr;12(2):129-33. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200304000-00007.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Number is a standard parameter of the GDx that reportedly distinguishes normal and glaucomatous eyes. The authors evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the Number and examined whether expert clinical judgment of GDx printouts leads to a better separation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two experienced observers judged 800 GDx scans on 400 randomly presented printouts from 200 glaucoma patients and 200 age-matched normal subjects. The diagnosis was based on the symmetry analysis printout and was per patient rather than per eye. The observers assessed sensitivity for all glaucoma patients together, and separately for mild, moderate, and severe glaucoma. Their specificity was determined in the group of normal subjects. The same procedure was performed for the Number, at various critical values.

RESULTS

Both observers discriminated better than the Number. At a critical value of 23, the specificity of the Number was 81.5%, which matched the lowest specificity of the 2 observers: 82.5% and 92.0% for observers 1 and 2, respectively. At these specificities, the sensitivity of the 2 observers and of the Number were 92.0%, 89.5%, and 85.5%, respectively. The sensitivity increased with the severity of glaucoma. The Kappa values for intraobserver agreement were 0.80 and 1.0.

CONCLUSIONS

The Number yielded acceptable sensitivity and specificity values at a critical value of 23 in this test population. However, the clinical judgments of the printouts by both expert observers resulted in a better separation between normal and glaucomatous eyes, particularly in the group with mild glaucoma.

摘要

目的

数字是GDx的一个标准参数,据报道可区分正常眼和青光眼眼。作者评估了该数字的敏感性和特异性,并检查了对GDx打印结果的专家临床判断是否能实现更好的区分。

材料与方法

两名经验丰富的观察者对来自200例青光眼患者和200例年龄匹配的正常受试者的400份随机呈现的打印结果进行了800次GDx扫描判断。诊断基于对称性分析打印结果,以患者为单位而非以眼为单位。观察者评估了所有青光眼患者的总体敏感性,以及轻度、中度和重度青光眼患者的敏感性。他们在正常受试者组中确定了特异性。对数字在不同临界值下进行了相同的操作。

结果

两名观察者的判断均优于数字。在临界值为23时,数字的特异性为81.5%,这与两名观察者的最低特异性相匹配:观察者1和观察者2的特异性分别为82.5%和92.0%。在这些特异性水平下,两名观察者和数字的敏感性分别为92.0%、89.5%和85.5%。敏感性随着青光眼严重程度的增加而提高。观察者内一致性的Kappa值分别为0.80和1.0。

结论

在该测试人群中,数字在临界值为23时产生了可接受的敏感性和特异性值。然而,两名专家观察者对打印结果的临床判断在正常眼和青光眼眼之间实现了更好的区分,尤其是在轻度青光眼组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验