Cabeza Roberto, Locantore Jill K, Anderson Nicole D
Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Feb 15;15(2):249-59. doi: 10.1162/089892903321208187.
We propose a new hypothesis concerning the lateralization of prefrontal cortex (PFC) activity during verbal episodic memory retrieval. The hypothesis states that the left PFC is differentially more involved in semantically guided information production than is the right PFC, and that the right PFC is differentially more involved in monitoring and verification than is the left PFC. This "production-monitoring hypothesis" differs from the existing "systematic-heuristic hypothesis," which proposes that the left PFC is primarily involved in systematic retrieval operations, and the right PFC in heuristic retrieval operations. To compare the two hypotheses, we measured PFC activity using positron emission tomography (PET) during the performance of four episodic retrieval tasks: stem cued recall, associative cued recall, context recognition (source memory), and item recognition. Recall tasks emphasized production processes, whereas recognition tasks emphasized monitoring processes. Stem cued recall and context-recognition tasks underscored systematic operations, whereas associative cued recall and item-recognition tasks underscored heuristic operations. Consistent with the production-monitoring hypothesis, the left PFC was more activated for recall than for recognition tasks and the right PFC was more activated for recognition than for recall tasks. Inconsistent with the systematic-heuristic hypothesis, the left PFC was more activated for heuristic than for systematic tasks and the right PFC showed the converse result. Additionally, the study yielded activation differences outside the PFC. In agreement with a previous recall/recognition PET study, anterior cingulate, cerebellar, and striatal regions were more activated for recall than for recognition tasks, and the converse occurred for posterior parietal regions. A right medial temporal lobe region was more activated for stem cued recall and context recognition than for associative cued recall and item recognition, possibly reflecting perceptual integration. In sum, the results provide evidence for the production-monitoring hypothesis and clarify the role of different brain regions typically activated in PET and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of episodic retrieval.
我们提出了一个关于言语情景记忆检索过程中前额叶皮层(PFC)活动偏侧化的新假设。该假设指出,与右侧前额叶皮层相比,左侧前额叶皮层在语义引导的信息生成方面参与程度更高,而右侧前额叶皮层在监测和验证方面参与程度更高。这个“生成 - 监测假设”与现有的“系统 - 启发式假设”不同,后者认为左侧前额叶皮层主要参与系统检索操作,右侧前额叶皮层参与启发式检索操作。为了比较这两个假设,我们在执行四项情景检索任务时使用正电子发射断层扫描(PET)测量前额叶皮层活动:词干线索回忆、联想线索回忆、情境识别(来源记忆)和项目识别。回忆任务强调生成过程,而识别任务强调监测过程。词干线索回忆和情境识别任务强调系统操作,而联想线索回忆和项目识别任务强调启发式操作。与生成 - 监测假设一致,左侧前额叶皮层在回忆任务中比在识别任务中激活更强,右侧前额叶皮层在识别任务中比在回忆任务中激活更强。与系统 - 启发式假设不一致的是,左侧前额叶皮层在启发式任务中比在系统任务中激活更强,而右侧前额叶皮层则呈现相反结果。此外,该研究还发现了前额叶皮层以外的激活差异。与之前一项回忆/识别PET研究一致,前扣带回、小脑和纹状体区域在回忆任务中比在识别任务中激活更强,而后顶叶区域则相反。右侧颞叶内侧区域在词干线索回忆和情境识别中比在联想线索回忆和项目识别中激活更强,这可能反映了知觉整合。总之,这些结果为生成 - 监测假设提供了证据,并阐明了在PET和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)情景检索研究中通常激活的不同脑区的作用。