ten Cate J M
Afdeling Cariologie Endodontologie Pedodontologie, Academisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam (ACTA), Louwesweg 1, 1066 EA Amsterdam.
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2003 Mar;110(3):102-6.
This paper discusses three articles on cariology from the 1950's in view of the current consensus of the pathogenesis, aetiology and prevention of dental caries. While 50 years ago the battle between researchers favouring the chemo parasitary versus those in support of the proteolytic theory of caries was at its peak, bacteria and acids formed in plaque have since been generally accepted as the cause of dental caries. Attention has shifted to the inhibiting role of fluoride in the initiation and progression of tooth decay, and the possible, additive action of antimicrobial therapy. As tooth decay is now a disease less common and progressing more slowly, there is scope for a more directed intervention and a preventive rather than a restorative therapeutic approach. In spite of the successes obtained a sizeable proportion of the population still suffers from dental caries and care should be taken not to diminish the attention for tooth decay both in the general dental practice and in dental research.
本文从当前关于龋齿发病机制、病因及预防的共识出发,探讨了20世纪50年代的三篇龋病学文章。50年前,支持化学寄生学说的研究人员与支持龋病蛋白溶解学说的人员之间的争论达到了顶峰,此后,菌斑中形成的细菌和酸已被普遍认为是龋齿的病因。人们的注意力已转向氟化物在龋齿发生和发展中的抑制作用,以及抗菌治疗可能的辅助作用。由于现在龋齿是一种不太常见且进展较慢的疾病,因此有空间采取更具针对性的干预措施以及预防性而非修复性的治疗方法。尽管已取得了一些成功,但仍有相当一部分人口患有龋齿,在一般牙科实践和牙科研究中都应注意不要减少对龋齿的关注。