Konno Toshikazu, Ebihara Takuya, Hisaeda Keiji, Uchiumi Takeshi, Nakamura Takanori, Shirakusa Takayuki, Kuwano Michihiko, Wada Morimasa
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
J Biol Chem. 2003 Jun 20;278(25):22908-17. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M302868200. Epub 2003 Apr 7.
The human multidrug resistance protein MRP1 and its homolog, MRP2, are both thought to be involved in cancer drug resistance and the transport of a wide variety of organic anions, including the cysteinyl leukotriene C4 (LTC4) (Km = 0.1 and 1 microm). To determine which domain of these proteins is associated with substrate specificity and subcellular localization, we constructed various chimeric MRP1/MRP2 molecules and expressed them in polarized mammalian LLC-PK1 cells. We examined the kinetic properties of each chimeric protein by measuring LTC4 and methotrexate transport in inside-out membrane vesicles, sensitivity to an anticancer agent, etoposide, and subcellular localization by indirect immunofluorescence methods. The following results were determined in these studies: (i) when the NH2-proximal 108 amino acids of MRP2, including transmembrane (TM) helices 1-3, were exchanged with the corresponding region of MRP1, Km(LTC4) values of the chimera decreased approximately 4-fold and Km(methotrexate) values increased approximately 5-fold relative to those of wild-type MRP2 and MRP1, respectively, whereas resistance to etoposide increased approximately 3-fold; (ii) when the NH2-proximal region up to TM9 of MRP2 was exchanged with the corresponding region of MRP1, a further increase in etoposide resistance was observed, and subcellular localization moved from the apical to the lateral membrane; (iii) when two-thirds of MRP2 at the NH2 terminus were exchanged with the corresponding MRP1 region, the chimeric protein transported LTC4 with an efficiency comparable with that achieved by the wild-type MRP1; and (iv) exchange of the COOH-terminal 51 amino acids between MRP1 and MRP2 did not affect the localization of either of the proteins. These results provide a strong framework for further studies aimed at determining the precise domains of MRP1 and MRP2 with affinity for LTC4 and anticancer agents.
人类多药耐药蛋白MRP1及其同源物MRP2均被认为与癌症耐药性以及多种有机阴离子的转运有关,这些有机阴离子包括半胱氨酰白三烯C4(LTC4)(Km分别为0.1和1微摩尔)。为了确定这些蛋白的哪个结构域与底物特异性和亚细胞定位相关,我们构建了各种嵌合的MRP1/MRP2分子,并在极化的哺乳动物LLC-PK1细胞中进行表达。我们通过测量内翻膜囊泡中LTC4和甲氨蝶呤的转运、对抗癌药物依托泊苷的敏感性以及采用间接免疫荧光法检测亚细胞定位,来研究每个嵌合蛋白的动力学特性。在这些研究中确定了以下结果:(i)当MRP2的氨基近端108个氨基酸(包括跨膜(TM)螺旋1-3)与MRP1的相应区域交换时,相对于野生型MRP2和MRP1,嵌合体的Km(LTC4)值分别降低了约4倍,Km(甲氨蝶呤)值分别增加了约5倍,而对依托泊苷的耐药性增加了约3倍;(ii)当MRP2的直至TM9的氨基近端区域与MRP1的相应区域交换时,观察到依托泊苷耐药性进一步增加,并且亚细胞定位从顶端膜转移至侧膜;(iii)当MRP2氨基末端的三分之二与相应的MRP1区域交换时,嵌合蛋白转运LTC4的效率与野生型MRP1相当;(iv)MRP1和MRP2之间羧基末端51个氨基酸的交换不影响任何一种蛋白的定位。这些结果为进一步研究提供了一个有力的框架,旨在确定MRP1和MRP2对LTC4和抗癌药物具有亲和力的精确结构域。