Suppr超能文献

除草剂施用量降低对西玛津在柑橘园径流水中的迁移及杂草防除的影响

Movement of simazine in runoff water and weed control from citrus orchard as affected by reduced rate of herbicide application.

作者信息

Liu F, O'Connell Neil

机构信息

Kearney Agricultural Center, University of California, Parlier, CA 93654, USA.

出版信息

Bioresour Technol. 2003 Feb;86(3):253-8. doi: 10.1016/s0960-8524(02)00164-5.

Abstract

Simazine (6-chloro-N,N'-diethyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine) and diuron (N'-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N,N-dimethylurea) are applied as pre-emergence herbicides to control weeds in over 45,000 hectare of citrus in the San Joaquin Valley of California. Growers usually apply 2.0 kg active ingredient (ai) ha(-1) simazine and 2.0 kg ai ha(-1) diuron together in the fall and winter seasons. Surface water and groundwater contamination, ecological, and health damage have led to increased regulatory attention and a search for changes in current weed management practices. Reduced application rate of simazine on runoff losses generated by simulated rainfall was studied in experiment 1. Treatments included a control without herbicide application and application of herbicides at 0.5, 1.0, 1.25 and 2.0 kg ai ha(-1). Three generated runoff events were produced using simulated rainfall with 540 l water. For each simulated rainfall event, the simazine concentration in runoff water was greatest at the first volumetric sampling interval, decreasing gradually in subsequent samples. Simazine concentration in runoff water for the three runoff events was undetectable for the control treatment. For the first simulated rainfall event, simazine concentrations in runoff water averaged 0.55, 1.07, 1.27, and 2.12 mg l(-1) for treatments receiving 0.5, 1.0, 1.25 and 2.0 kg ai ha(-1) herbicide application, respectively; simazine concentration in runoff water from the second event one week later averaged 0.16, 0.27, 0.36, and 0.58 kg ai ha(-1) and two weeks later the concentration was reduced to 0.05, 0.10, 0.14 and 0.22 mg l(-1), respectively. Total simazine mass recovered in runoff water from the three simulated rainfall events was estimated approximately 13.8, 26.3, 32.3 and 53.8 g ha(-1) for the treatments receiving herbicide application at 0.5, 1.0, 1.25 and 2.0 kg ai ha(-1), respectively. Field evaluation of weed density showed that pre-emergence herbicides applied at reduced rates (1.0 and 1.25 kg ai ha(-1)) were as effective as the standard rate (2.0 kg ai ha(-1)) for weed control in experiment 2.

摘要

西玛津(6-氯-N,N'-二乙基-1,3,5-三嗪-2,4-二胺)和敌草隆(N'-(3,4-二氯苯基)-N,N-二甲基脲)作为芽前除草剂,用于加利福尼亚州圣华金谷超过45000公顷的柑橘园中控制杂草。种植者通常在秋冬季节将2.0千克活性成分(ai)/公顷的西玛津和2.0千克ai/公顷的敌草隆一起施用。地表水和地下水污染、生态及健康损害已导致监管关注度增加,并促使人们寻求改变当前的杂草管理做法。在实验1中研究了降低西玛津施用量对模拟降雨产生的径流损失的影响。处理包括不施用除草剂的对照以及分别以0.5、1.0、1.25和2.0千克ai/公顷的用量施用除草剂。使用540升水的模拟降雨产生了三次径流事件。对于每次模拟降雨事件,径流水中西玛津浓度在第一个体积采样间隔时最高,在后续样本中逐渐降低。对照处理的三次径流事件的径流水中均未检测到西玛津浓度。对于第一次模拟降雨事件,分别以0.5、1.0、1.25和2.0千克ai/公顷施用除草剂的处理,径流水中西玛津浓度平均分别为0.55、1.07、1.27和2. I2毫克/升;一周后的第二次事件径流水中西玛津浓度平均分别为0.16、0.27、0.36和0.58千克ai/公顷,两周后浓度分别降至0.05、0.10、0.14和0.22毫克/升。对于分别以0.5、1.0、1.25和2.0千克ai/公顷施用除草剂的处理,三次模拟降雨事件径流水中回收的西玛津总量估计分别约为13.8、26.3、32.3和53.8克/公顷。在实验2中,对杂草密度的田间评估表明,以降低的用量(1.0和1.25千克ai/公顷)施用芽前除草剂在控制杂草方面与标准用量(2.0千克ai/公顷)一样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验