van den Berg-Vos R M, Visser J, Franssen H, de Visser M, de Jong J M B V, Kalmijn S, Wokke J H J, van den Berg L H
Department of Neurology of the Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neurosciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Brain. 2003 May;126(Pt 5):1036-47. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg117.
The discovery of the genetic basis of hereditary lower motor neuron disease (LMND) and the recognition of multifocal motor neuropathy as a distinct clinical entity necessitate a new classification of LMND. To this end, we studied the clinical and electrophysiological features of 49 patients with sporadic adult-onset LMND in a cross-sectional study. Disease duration was more than 4 years to exclude the majority of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Based on the pattern of weakness, we identified three groups: 13 patients with generalized weakness (group 1); eight patients with symmetrical, distal muscle weakness (group 2); and 28 patients with non-generalized asymmetrical weakness of the arms in most patients (group 3). Group 3 could be subdivided into patients with weakness in predominantly the distal (group 3a) or the proximal (group 3b) muscle groups, both with disease progression to adjacent spinal cord segments. Distinctive features of group 1 were an older age at onset, more severe weakness and muscle atrophy, lower reflexes, greater functional impairment, more widespread abnormalities on concentric needle EMG, respiratory insufficiency and serum M-protein. In groups 2 and 3, concentric needle EMG findings also suggested a more widespread disease process. Retrospectively, the prognosis of sporadic adult-onset LMND appears to be favourable, because clinical abnormalities were still confined to one limb in most patients after a median disease duration of 12 years. We propose to classify the patients in the different subgroups as slowly progressive spinal muscular atrophy (group 1), distal spinal muscular atrophy (group 2), segmental distal spinal muscular atrophy (group 3a) and segmental proximal spinal muscular atrophy (group 3b). The described clinical phenotypes may help to distinguish between different LMND forms.
遗传性下运动神经元疾病(LMND)遗传基础的发现以及多灶性运动神经病作为一种独特临床实体的确认,使得有必要对LMND进行新的分类。为此,我们在一项横断面研究中对49例散发性成人起病的LMND患者的临床和电生理特征进行了研究。病程超过4年,以排除大多数肌萎缩侧索硬化患者。根据肌无力模式,我们确定了三组:13例全身肌无力患者(第1组);8例对称性、远端肌肉无力患者(第2组);28例大多数患者表现为非全身性不对称性手臂肌无力患者(第3组)。第3组可再细分为主要为远端肌无力患者(第3a组)或近端肌无力患者(第3b组),两者疾病均进展至相邻脊髓节段。第1组的显著特征为起病年龄较大、肌无力和肌肉萎缩更严重、反射减弱、功能障碍更明显、同心针肌电图上异常更广泛、呼吸功能不全和血清M蛋白。在第2组和第3组中,同心针肌电图结果也提示疾病过程更广泛。回顾性分析,散发性成人起病的LMND预后似乎良好,因为在疾病中位病程12年后,大多数患者临床异常仍局限于一个肢体。我们建议将不同亚组的患者分类为缓慢进展性脊髓性肌萎缩(第1组)、远端脊髓性肌萎缩(第2组)、节段性远端脊髓性肌萎缩(第3a组)和节段性近端脊髓性肌萎缩(第3b组)。所描述的临床表型可能有助于区分不同形式的LMND。