Hagge Mark S, Wong Ralan D M, Lindemuth James S
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of the Pacific School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California 94115, USA.
Am J Dent. 2002 Dec;15(6):378-82.
To examine the effect post-obturation sequencing had on retention of endodontic posts luted with a phosphate monomer-based resin cement into canals previously obturated using a eugenol-based sealer.
64 single-rooted teeth were decoronated, and root canals were filed, cleaned, and shaped with a size 5 Gates Glidden drill and 0.12 taper rotary instrumentation. Teeth were then divided into 4 groups of 16 specimens each. Group 1 was not obturated, and served as a control. The other three groups were obturated with gutta percha and a eugenol-based sealer. Post space preparation and post cementation were completed at three different post-obturation intervals - immediate (Group 2), 1 week (Group 3), and 4 weeks (Group 4). Ten-mm deep post spaces were prepared with a size 6 Gates Glidden drill, and size 5 Paraposts were cemented with Panavia 21 OP. Following 48-hour of storage, specimens were mounted in PVC pipe with acrylic, and the posts were removed in tensile mode using a universal testing machine at 1 mm min(-1), with data recorded in kilograms.
Group 1 (controls) mean = 61.80, SD = 16.21; Group 2 (immediate) mean = 38.70, SD = 12.97; Group 3 (1 week) mean = 43.15, SD = 14.66; Group 4 (4 weeks) mean = 18.82, SD = 8.00. Using ANOVA and Bonferroni tests, Group 1 demonstrated significantly greater mean retention strength values than Groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.05), which in turn had significantly greater mean retention strength values than Group 4 (P < 0.05).
研究根管充填后不同时间序列对使用基于磷酸盐单体的树脂水门汀粘结至先前用丁香酚类封闭剂充填的根管内的根管桩固位力的影响。
选取64颗单根牙,截冠后用5号Gates Glidden钻和0.12锥度的旋转器械进行根管预备、清理和成形。然后将牙齿分为4组,每组16个样本。第1组不进行根管充填,作为对照组。其他三组用牙胶和丁香酚类封闭剂进行根管充填。在根管充填后的三个不同时间间隔进行桩道预备和桩粘结——即刻(第2组)、1周(第3组)和4周(第4组)。用6号Gates Glidden钻制备10 mm深的桩道,并用Panavia 21 OP粘结5号Parapost桩。储存48小时后,将样本用丙烯酸树脂固定在PVC管中,使用万能试验机以1 mm/min(-1)的速度在拉伸模式下取出桩,数据记录为千克。
第1组(对照组)均值=61.80,标准差=16.21;第2组(即刻)均值=38.70,标准差=12.97;第3组(1周)均值=43.15,标准差=14.66;第4组(4周)均值=18.82,标准差=8.00。使用方差分析和Bonferroni检验,第1组的平均固位力值显著高于第2组和第3组(P<0.05),而第2组和第3组又显著高于第4组(P<0.05)。