Nussbaum Maury A, Johnson Hope
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA.
Hum Factors. 2002 Winter;44(4):545-56. doi: 10.1518/0018720024496908.
Acceptable limits derived from psychophysical methodologies have been proposed, measured, and employed in a range of applications. There is little existing work, however, on such limits for single-digit exertions and relatively limited evidence on several fundamental issues related to data collection and processing of a sequence of self-regulated exertion levels. An experimental study was conducted using 14 male and 10 female participants (age range 18-31 years) from whom maximal voluntary exertions and maximal acceptable limits (MALs) were obtained using the index finger and thumb. Moderate to high levels of consistency were found for both measures between sessions separated by one day. Single MAL values, determined from a time series of exertions, were equivalent across three divergent processing methods and between values obtained from 5- and 25-min samples. A critical interpretation of these and earlier results supports continued use of acceptable limits but also suggests that they should be used with some caution and not equated with safe limits. This research can be applied toward future development of exertion limits based on perceived acceptability.
源自心理物理学方法的可接受极限已在一系列应用中被提出、测量并采用。然而,关于单指用力的此类极限,现有研究较少,且在与一系列自我调节用力水平的数据收集和处理相关的几个基本问题上,证据相对有限。使用14名男性和10名女性参与者(年龄范围18 - 31岁)进行了一项实验研究,通过食指和拇指获取了他们的最大自主用力和最大可接受极限(MALs)。在间隔一天的各次测量之间,两种测量方法均发现了中等到高度的一致性。从用力时间序列确定的单个MAL值,在三种不同的处理方法之间以及从5分钟和25分钟样本获得的值之间是等效的。对这些结果和早期结果的批判性解读支持继续使用可接受极限,但也表明应谨慎使用,且不应将其等同于安全极限。这项研究可应用于基于感知可接受性的用力极限的未来发展。