Tang Wai-Kwong, Ungvari Gabor S
Department of Psychiatry, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, 11/F, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2003 May;27(3):373-9. doi: 10.1016/S0278-5846(02)00354-8.
There is a lack of controlled trials examining the effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) combined with olanzapine or risperidone in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). The authors conducted a prospective, open, controlled trial of ECT in TRS in a long-term psychiatric rehabilitation unit in Hong Kong. Thirty patients with TRS from an inpatient psychiatric rehabilitation unit participated in this study. All subjects were resistant to a host of antipsychotic medications given singly or in different combinations. In addition, they were also resistant to or they refused clozapine treatment. Fifteen patients completed a course of ECT consisting of 8-20 sessions. Fifteen patients who refused ECT formed the control Subjects were assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months after their last ECT. Assessment instruments included the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), Global Assessment Scale (GAS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), CGI Severity of Illness [CGI(SOI)], CGI Global Improvement [CGI(GI)], Nurses' Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation (NOSIE-30), and occupational therapists' rating of the subjects' functioning with respect to work (OT-W), social (OT-S), and leisure (OT-L) activities. In comparison with the control group, the ECT group showed statistically significant improvement only in the GAS and CGI at each posttreatment evaluation. There was a trend for ECT to reduce positive and negative symptoms, although the rate of improvement did not reach statistically significant levels. ECT augmentation of risperidone and olanzapine is of marginal efficacy compared to reports of the greater augmentation of these antipsychotics with other agents.
目前缺乏对照试验来检验电休克疗法(ECT)联合奥氮平或利培酮治疗难治性精神分裂症(TRS)的有效性。作者在香港的一个长期精神病康复单元中进行了一项关于ECT治疗TRS的前瞻性、开放性对照试验。30名来自住院精神病康复单元的TRS患者参与了本研究。所有受试者对单独或不同组合使用的多种抗精神病药物均耐药。此外,他们对氯氮平治疗也耐药或拒绝接受氯氮平治疗。15名患者完成了一个疗程的ECT,共8 - 20次治疗。15名拒绝ECT的患者组成对照组。在基线、最后一次ECT后的1周、1个月和2个月对受试者进行评估。评估工具包括简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)、汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS)、阴性症状评定量表(SANS)、总体评定量表(GAS)、临床总体印象(CGI)、CGI疾病严重程度[CGI(SOI)]、CGI总体改善情况[CGI(GI)]、护士住院患者评价观察量表(NOSIE - 30)以及职业治疗师对受试者在工作(OT - W)、社交(OT - S)和休闲(OT - L)活动方面功能的评定。与对照组相比,ECT组在每次治疗后评估中仅在GAS和CGI方面有统计学显著改善。ECT有减轻阳性和阴性症状的趋势,尽管改善率未达到统计学显著水平。与这些抗精神病药物与其他药物联合使用有更大增效作用的报道相比,ECT联合利培酮和奥氮平的增效作用甚微。