Xu K Tom, Borders Tyrone F
Department of Health Services Research and Management, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock 79430, USA.
J Rural Health. 2003 Spring;19(2):156-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2003.tb00557.x.
The bypassing of local pharmacies by consumers is an indicator of limited accessibility and, possibly, compromised quality of rural pharmacy services.
The objective of this study was to identify the characteristics of rural consumers who bypassed local pharmacies for their medication needs.
The sample was derived from the Texas Tech 5000, a longitudinal survey in West Texas, and pharmacy data from the Texas State Board of Pharmacy. The sample included 1062 people aged 65 or older who lived in rural counties and had at least one community pharmacy in town. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the demographic, financial, nonfinancial, prescription and over-the-counter drug use, and health characteristics that were associated with the probabilities of the subjects' using local community pharmacies, nonlocal community pharmacies, and mail-order pharmacies.
In the sample, 70.8%, 13.7%, and 15.5% of elderly people primarily used local pharmacies, nonlocal pharmacies, and mail-order pharmacies, respectively. The oldest subjects, women subjects, subjects with no employer-provided or other federal insurance, subjects who had a regular doctor, and subjects living within city limits and in areas with a higher density of community pharmacies had lower probabilities of choosing nonlocal pharmacies over local pharmacies. Insurance coverage for prescriptions was one of the most important determinants in choosing mail-order pharmacies over local community pharmacies.
Additional research is warranted to further understand the choices made by older people, as well as by younger people who use medications. In particular, further investigation of the potential differences between services provided by rural-community, urban-community, and mail-order pharmacies is needed to identify other reasons for bypassing local pharmacies.
消费者绕过当地药店是可及性有限的一个指标,也可能意味着农村药店服务质量受到影响。
本研究的目的是确定那些绕过当地药店满足其用药需求的农村消费者的特征。
样本来自德克萨斯理工大学5000项目,这是一项在西德克萨斯进行的纵向调查,以及德克萨斯州药房委员会的药房数据。样本包括1062名年龄在65岁及以上、居住在农村县且所在城镇至少有一家社区药店的人。进行了双变量和多变量分析,以调查与受试者使用当地社区药店、非当地社区药店和邮购药店的概率相关的人口统计学、财务、非财务、处方药和非处方药使用以及健康特征。
在样本中,分别有70.8%、13.7%和15.5%的老年人主要使用当地药店、非当地药店和邮购药店。年龄最大的受试者、女性受试者、没有雇主提供或其他联邦保险的受试者、有固定医生的受试者以及居住在城市范围内和社区药店密度较高地区的受试者,选择非当地药店而非当地药店的概率较低。处方保险覆盖是选择邮购药店而非当地社区药店的最重要决定因素之一。
有必要进行进一步研究,以进一步了解老年人以及使用药物的年轻人所做的选择。特别是,需要进一步调查农村社区、城市社区和邮购药店提供的服务之间的潜在差异,以确定绕过当地药店的其他原因。