Miczo Nathan
University of Arizona, USA.
Qual Health Res. 2003 Apr;13(4):469-90. doi: 10.1177/1049732302250756.
The author explores the technique of interviewing chronic illness patients to obtain narratives of their illness experiences. It is argued that the perspective that interview responses are accurate reflections of experience (the "fetishism of words") hampers the understanding of patient voice and agency. Discussions of chronic illness and narrative are followed by an examination of the interview based on the work of Charles L. Briggs. The author then uses the concepts of self-presentation and social support to examine what interviewers and interviewees contribute to the coconstructed discourse that is produced by the interview and addresses the question of how these concepts contribute to the beneficial outcomes of constructing narratives. The author offers specific suggestions for future research.
作者探讨了采访慢性病患者以获取其疾病经历叙述的技巧。有人认为,认为访谈回应是经历的准确反映这一观点(“对言语的盲目崇拜”)阻碍了对患者声音和能动性的理解。在讨论慢性病与叙述之后,基于查尔斯·L·布里格斯的研究对访谈进行了审视。作者随后运用自我呈现和社会支持的概念,来考察访谈者和受访者对访谈所产生的共同构建话语有何贡献,并探讨这些概念如何促成构建叙述的有益结果。作者为未来研究提供了具体建议。