Gowda Manohar S, Loeb Audrey L, Crouse Linda J, Kramer Paul H
University of Missouri-Kansas City, Mid America Heart Institute, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Apr 16;41(8):1305-11. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02408-7.
The purpose of this study was to compare color-flow duplex imaging (CFDI), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and renal arteriography in diagnosing renal artery (RA) fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) and correlating with the hemodynamic response to balloon angioplasty (BA) in patients with drug-resistant hypertension.
Renal arteriography is generally regarded as the gold standard for diagnosing RA FMD. The observation that CFDI and IVUS depicted endoluminal abnormalities suggestive of RA FMD in some patients with normal renal arteriograms prompted comparison of these modalities in a consecutive series of patients.
Twenty hypertensive patients with CFDI suggestive of RA FMD (mid-to-distal flow derangement and velocity augmentation) underwent renal arteriography, IVUS, and BA, with both immediate and long-term blood pressure (BP) response assessment.
All patients were women, aged 31 to 86 years (mean 62 years). On IVUS, various endoluminal defects (eccentric ridges; fluttering membranes; spiraling folds) were depicted at locations predicted by CFDI and were uniformly identified at sites where arteriography depicted classic evidence of FMD (8 patients). However, similar defects were detected by IVUS when angiography was borderline (7 patients) or normal (5 patients). Balloon angioplasty eliminated (16 patients) or reduced (4 patients) the IVUS findings and lowered systolic BP in all (mean reduction 53 mm Hg, p < 0.0001). This reduction was maintained during follow-up of 4 to 22 (mean 13) months (mean reduction 44 mm Hg, p < 0.0001), independent of baseline angiographic appearance.
Both CFDI and IVUS depict the blood flow and endoluminal abnormalities of RA FMD. Balloon angioplasty eliminates or improves IVUS findings and produces substantial, sustained BP reduction, an effect that is independent of baseline arteriographic appearance, calling into question the legitimacy of arteriography as the diagnostic gold standard.
本研究旨在比较彩色血流双功成像(CFDI)、血管内超声(IVUS)和肾动脉造影在诊断肾动脉(RA)纤维肌性发育异常(FMD)方面的效果,并将其与耐药性高血压患者球囊血管成形术(BA)后的血流动力学反应相关联。
肾动脉造影通常被视为诊断RA FMD的金标准。在一些肾动脉造影正常的患者中,CFDI和IVUS显示出提示RA FMD的腔内异常,这促使对这些检查方式在一系列连续患者中进行比较。
20例CFDI提示RA FMD(中至远端血流紊乱和速度增加)的高血压患者接受了肾动脉造影、IVUS和BA,并对即时和长期血压(BP)反应进行评估。
所有患者均为女性,年龄31至86岁(平均62岁)。在IVUS上,CFDI预测的位置出现了各种腔内缺陷(偏心嵴;飘动的膜;螺旋状褶皱),并且在动脉造影显示FMD典型证据的部位均能一致识别(8例患者)。然而,当血管造影处于临界状态(7例患者)或正常(5例患者)时,IVUS也检测到了类似的缺陷。球囊血管成形术消除了(16例患者)或减少了(4例患者)IVUS检查结果,并且所有患者的收缩压均降低(平均降低53 mmHg,p < 0.0001)。在4至22(平均13)个月的随访期间,这种降低得以维持(平均降低44 mmHg,p < 0.0001),且与基线血管造影表现无关。
CFDI和IVUS均能显示RA FMD的血流和腔内异常。球囊血管成形术消除或改善了IVUS检查结果,并使血压大幅持续降低,这一效果与基线动脉造影表现无关,从而对动脉造影作为诊断金标准的合理性提出了质疑。