Suppr超能文献

医生主导的教育活动对门诊环境中正确进行糖尿病足检查的影响。

Effect of a physician-directed educational campaign on performance of proper diabetic foot exams in an outpatient setting.

作者信息

O'Brien Kevin E, Chandramohan Vineeth, Nelson Douglas A, Fischer Joseph R, Stevens Gary, Poremba John A

机构信息

Received from the Divisions of General Internal Medicine, Wilford Hall Medical Center, San Antonio, Tex., USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Apr;18(4):258-65. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10662.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The established guidelines for a diabetes foot examination include assessing circulatory, skin, and neurological status to detect problems early and reduce the likelihood of amputation. Physician adherence to the guidelines for proper examination is less than optimal.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to increase compliance with the performance of a proper foot examination through a predominantly physician-directed interventional campaign.

METHODS

The study consisted of 3 parts: a retrospective chart review to estimate background compliance, an educational intervention, and prospective chart review at 3 and 6 months. A properly documented foot examination was defined as assessing at least 2 of the 3 necessary components. The educational intervention consisted of 2 lectures directed at resident physicians and a quality assurance announcement at a general internal medicine staff meeting. Clinic support staff were instructed to remove the shoes and socks of all diabetic patients when they were placed in exam rooms, and signs reminding diabetics were placed in each exam room.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in the performance of proper foot examination over the course of the study (baseline 14.0%, 3 months 58.0%, 6 months 62.1%; P <.001). Documentation of any component of a proper foot examination also increased substantially (32.6%, 67.3%, 72.5%; P <.001). Additionally, performance of each component of a proper exam increased dramatically during the study: neurological (13.5%, 35.8%, 38.5%; P <.001), skin (23.0%, 64.2%, 69.2%; P <.001), and vascular (14.0%, 51.2%, 50.5%; P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with diabetes are unlikely to have foot examinations in their primary medical care. A simple, low-cost educational intervention significantly improved the adherence to foot examination guidelines for patients with diabetes.

摘要

背景

糖尿病足部检查的既定指南包括评估循环、皮肤和神经状况,以便早期发现问题并降低截肢的可能性。医生对正确检查指南的遵循情况并不理想。

目的

我们的目标是通过一项主要由医生主导的干预活动,提高对正确足部检查的依从性。

方法

该研究包括三个部分:回顾性病历审查以评估基线依从性、教育干预,以及在3个月和6个月时进行前瞻性病历审查。正确记录的足部检查被定义为评估三个必要组成部分中的至少两个。教育干预包括针对住院医师的两场讲座以及在内科全体医护人员会议上发布的质量保证公告。指示诊所辅助人员在将所有糖尿病患者安置在检查室时脱掉他们的鞋子和袜子,并在每个检查室放置提醒糖尿病患者的标志。

结果

在研究过程中,正确足部检查的执行情况有显著提高(基线为14.0%,3个月时为58.0%,6个月时为62.1%;P<.001)。正确足部检查任何组成部分的记录也大幅增加(32.6%、67.3%、72.5%;P<.001)。此外,在研究期间,正确检查的每个组成部分的执行情况都有显著提高:神经检查(13.5%、35.8%、38.5%;P<.001)、皮肤检查(23.0%、64.2%、69.2%;P<.001)和血管检查(14.0%、51.2%、50.5%;P<.001)。

结论

糖尿病患者在初级医疗保健中不太可能进行足部检查。一项简单、低成本的教育干预显著提高了糖尿病患者对足部检查指南的依从性。

相似文献

2
Improving Foot Examinations in Patients With Diabetes: A Performance Improvement Continuing Medical Education (PI-CME) Project.
Diabetes Educ. 2014 May;40(3):281-289. doi: 10.1177/0145721714526789. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
4
Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of performing the diabetic foot exam.
Am J Med Qual. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):193-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860610383166. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
5
Exploring Diabetic Foot Exam Performance in a Specialty Clinic.
Clin Nurs Res. 2017 Feb;26(1):82-92. doi: 10.1177/1054773815596699. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
7
Treatment of modifiable risk factors for foot ulceration in persons with diabetes: a systematic review.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1:e3271. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3271. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
8
Electronic clinical reminder and quality of primary diabetes care.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2019 Apr;13(2):150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
Prevalence of appropriate management of diabetes mellitus in an academic general medicine clinic.
Am J Ther. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):42-5. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181822e78.

引用本文的文献

3
Comparison of Endocrinologists' Physical Examination Documentation for In-person vs Video Telehealth Diabetes Visits.
J Endocr Soc. 2023 Jun 17;7(7):bvad073. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvad073. eCollection 2023 Jun 5.
7
Identifying and Addressing Language Needs in Primary Care: a Pilot Implementation Study.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Jun;6(3):505-516. doi: 10.1007/s40615-018-00549-6. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
8
Impact of an educational intervention on medical records documentation.
World J Emerg Med. 2018;9(2):136-140. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2018.02.009.

本文引用的文献

1
Preventive foot care in people with diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2003 Jan;26 Suppl 1:S78-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s78.
2
American Diabetes Association: clinical practice recommendations 2002.
Diabetes Care. 2002 Jan;25 Suppl 1:S1-147. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.2007.s1.
4
Implementing preventive care in clinical practice. II. Problems for managers, clinicians and patients.
Med Care Rev. 1981 Winter;38(4):195-216. doi: 10.1177/107755878103800401.
6
The development and complications of diabetic foot ulcers.
Am J Surg. 1998 Aug;176(2A Suppl):11S-19S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00182-2.
7
Practical criteria for screening patients at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration.
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Jan 26;158(2):157-62. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.2.157.
8
Foot lesions in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1996 Jun;25(2):447-62. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70333-9.
10
Assessment of diabetes care by medical record review. The Indian Health Service model.
Diabetes Care. 1994 Aug;17(8):918-23. doi: 10.2337/diacare.17.8.918.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验