Björkholm M, Johansson E, Papamichael D, Celsing F, Matthews J, Lister T A, Rohatiner A Z S
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Karolinska Hospital and Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Semin Oncol. 2003 Apr;30(2):226-30. doi: 10.1053/sonc.2003.50054.
Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification considered to be a clinical syndrome rather than a specific pathologic diagnosis. The clinical manifestations associated with WM relate to direct tumor infiltration, hyperviscosity, and deposition of IgM in various tissues. The indications for and choice of treatment vary considerably and no generally accepted prognostic models exist. The clinical features, treatment, and prognosis of 72 patients with WM seen at one British (n = 36) and one Swedish (n = 36) academic center were therefore compared. Significantly more patients presented with a low albumin concentration (< v > 40 g/L, P <.001), anemia (hemoglobin < v > 120 g/L; P <.001), thrombocytopenia (< v > 150 x 10(9)/L; P <.05), hepatomegaly (P <.001), splenomegaly (P <.01), and lymphadenopathy (P <.01), at St Bartholomew's Hospital (SBH) in comparison to the Karolinska Hospital (KH). Fifty-six percent of SBH patients received chemotherapy immediately following diagnosis as compared to 14% at KH. The median overall survival of all patients was 6.3 years; 4.2 years and 11.0 years at SBH and KH, respectively (P <.001). In univariate analysis, anemia (hemoglobin < 120 g/L) and albumin < 35 g/L (but not <40 g/L) at diagnosis predicted a worse overall survival. The presence of hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly and/or lymphadenopathy was significantly associated with anemia (P <.001) and hypoalbuminaemia (P <.001). The mean Morel score (including age, albumin, and cytopenias) of patients treated at SBH (2.6) was significantly higher than that of KH patients (1.6; P <.001). These findings illustrate the clinical heterogeneity of WM, most probably explained by differences in referral patterns, and in addition, indicate the need for establishing standard criteria for diagnosis, response to treatment, and prognostic features.
华氏巨球蛋白血症(WM)在世界卫生组织(WHO)分类中被认为是一种临床综合征,而非特定的病理诊断。与WM相关的临床表现涉及肿瘤直接浸润、血液黏滞度增高以及IgM在各种组织中的沉积。治疗的适应证和选择差异很大,且不存在普遍接受的预后模型。因此,对在一家英国学术中心(n = 36)和一家瑞典学术中心(n = 36)就诊的72例WM患者的临床特征、治疗及预后进行了比较。与卡罗林斯卡医院(KH)相比,圣巴塞洛缪医院(SBH)有更多患者出现白蛋白浓度低(< 40 g/L,P <.001)、贫血(血红蛋白< 120 g/L;P <.001)、血小板减少(< 150×10⁹/L;P <.05)、肝肿大(P <.001)、脾肿大(P <.01)和淋巴结病(P <.01)。与KH医院14%的患者相比,SBH医院56%的患者在诊断后立即接受了化疗。所有患者的中位总生存期为6.3年;SBH医院和KH医院分别为4.2年和11.0年(P <.001)。在单因素分析中,诊断时贫血(血红蛋白< 120 g/L)和白蛋白< 35 g/L(而非< 40 g/L)预示总生存期较差。肝肿大和/或脾肿大和/或淋巴结病的存在与贫血(P <.001)和低白蛋白血症(P <.001)显著相关。在SBH医院接受治疗的患者的平均莫雷尔评分(包括年龄、白蛋白和血细胞减少)(2.6)显著高于KH医院的患者(1.6;P <.001)。这些发现说明了WM的临床异质性,很可能是由转诊模式的差异所解释,此外,还表明需要建立诊断、治疗反应和预后特征的标准。