Concerns over refuge size for US EPA-approved Bt corn.
作者信息
Powell Kendall
出版信息
Nat Biotechnol. 2003 May;21(5):467-8. doi: 10.1038/nbt0503-467.
PMID:12721555
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Concerns over refuge size for US EPA-approved Bt corn.
Nat Biotechnol. 2003 May;21(5):467-8. doi: 10.1038/nbt0503-467.
2
Agency 'ignoring its advisers' over Bt maize.
Nature. 2003 Mar 6;422(6927):5. doi: 10.1038/422005a.
3
Coexistence in the EU-return of the moratorium on GM crops?
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Nov;26(11):1223-5. doi: 10.1038/nbt1108-1223.
4
Testing Bt refuge strategies in the field.
Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Mar;18(3):266-7. doi: 10.1038/73693.
5
Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Sep;18(9):920. doi: 10.1038/79379.
6
Survey raises concerns about Bt resistance management.
Nat Biotechnol. 2001 Apr;19(4):293-4. doi: 10.1038/86623.
7
Regulatory oversight in developing nations.
Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jun;20(6):547-8. doi: 10.1038/nbt0602-547b.
8
Report claims no yield advantage for Bt crops.
Nat Biotechnol. 2009 Jul;27(7):588-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt0709-588.
9
Rhône-Poulenc rounds up DeKalb and Monsanto.
Nat Biotechnol. 1997 Dec;15(13):1332. doi: 10.1038/nbt1297-1332.
10
Don't rely on Uncle Sam.
Nature. 2005 Apr 14;434(7035):807. doi: 10.1038/434807a.
Zotero 插件