Hermida Ramón C, Ayala Diana E, Fernández José R, Mojón Artemio, Alonso Ignacio, Aguilar María F, Ucieda Rafael, Codesido José, Iglesias Manuel
Laboratorio de Bioingeniería y Cronobiología. Universidad de Vigo. Pontevedra. España.
Med Clin (Barc). 2003 Apr 19;120(14):521-8. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(03)73764-6.
Changes in circadian variation of blood pressure could be used either to predict preeclampsia or to assess its severity. With the objective of identifying potential differences in blood pressure at the early stages of pregnancy, we examined and compared the characteristics of circadian variability in blood pressure in healthy and complicated pregnant women who were systematically monitored throughout gestation.
We analyzed 2,014 blood pressure series sampled through ambulatory monitoring for 48 hours once every 4 weeks from the first obstetric visit until delivery. The study included 205 women with uncomplicated pregnancy, 92 with gestational hypertension and 31 with preeclampsia. The circadian pattern of blood pressure variation for each group and trimester of gestation was established by means of a population multiple-components analysis.
Differences in the 24-hour mean between healthy and complicated pregnancies were highly significant in all trimesters (p < 0.001), with values of 15.1 and 9.1 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood presure, respectively, in the third trimester of pregnancy. The 24-hour mean of systolic/diastolic blood pressure for complicated pregnancies was always below 120/72 mmHg. Results further indicated similar circadian characteristics between gestational hypertension and preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy. The difference between these two groups in the 24-hour mean was significant in the second trimester for systolic (3 mmHg; p = 0.002) but not diastolic blood pressure (0.9 mmHg; p = 0.230). In the third trimester, the difference between gestational hypertension and preeclampsia was significant for both variables (5.4 and 3.7 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively; p < 0.001).
The differences in blood pressure between healthy and complicated pregnancies, which are observed as early as the first trimester of pregnancy, are detected when both systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements in women with a late diagnosis of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia fall within accepted ranges of normotension. These differences offer new end points that may lead to an early identification of hypertensive complications in pregnancy as well as to the establishment of prophylactic interventions.
血压昼夜变化的改变可用于预测子痫前期或评估其严重程度。为了确定妊娠早期血压的潜在差异,我们对整个孕期进行系统监测的健康孕妇和合并症孕妇的血压昼夜变异性特征进行了检查和比较。
我们分析了从首次产科就诊直至分娩期间,每4周通过动态监测采集一次的48小时血压序列,共2014个。研究包括205例无合并症妊娠的妇女、92例妊娠期高血压妇女和31例子痫前期妇女。通过总体多成分分析确定每组和妊娠各期的血压变化昼夜模式。
健康妊娠与合并症妊娠在所有孕期的24小时均值差异均极显著(p < 0.001),妊娠晚期收缩压和舒张压的均值分别为15.1 mmHg和9.1 mmHg。合并症妊娠的收缩压/舒张压24小时均值始终低于120/72 mmHg。结果还表明,妊娠早期妊娠期高血压和子痫前期的昼夜特征相似。这两组在妊娠中期24小时均值的差异在收缩压方面显著(3 mmHg;p = 0.002),但舒张压方面不显著(0.9 mmHg;p = 0.230)。在妊娠晚期,妊娠期高血压与子痫前期在两个变量上的差异均显著(收缩压和舒张压分别为5.4 mmHg和3.7 mmHg;p < 0.001)。
健康妊娠与合并症妊娠之间的血压差异早在妊娠早期就可观察到,当妊娠期高血压或子痫前期诊断较晚的妇女收缩压和舒张压测量值均在正常血压的可接受范围内时即可检测到。这些差异提供了新的终点指标,可能有助于早期识别妊娠高血压并发症以及建立预防性干预措施。