Sarmiento Juan M, Que Florencia G
Division of Gastroenterologic and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2003 Jan;12(1):231-42. doi: 10.1016/s1055-3207(02)00076-5.
Cytoreductive therapy is effective in the management of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors to the liver, independent of their functioning status. In functioning tumors, clinical endocrinopathies are relieved in most patients and this response usually lasts for several months. Major morbidity and mortality are not greater than the average complication rate for resection for nonneuroendocrine metastatic tumors at major centers; therefore, surgical outcomes appear to justify operative intervention. Patients whose primary tumor can be controlled, whose metastases outside the liver are limited, and who have a reasonable performance status are candidates for resection. The authors' data support the previous statements. The current mortality rate of 1.2% and major morbidity rate of 15% clearly represent the success of the operative approach in such complex cases (54% of patients received a resection of at least one lobe) [9]. A symptomatic response in the 95% range with a median response of 45 months adds many months of symptom-free survival to the lives of most patients [9]. In the literature reviewed for this article, more than half of the patients also underwent a major hepatic resection and 40% of them had concurrent resection of the primary tumor. These data confirm that resection in selected patients is not more complicated or risky than resection for other metastatic tumors. Endocrinopathies have not increased anesthetic or operative risk in this population; however, these results are the product of managing these patients over time, becoming familiar with their clinical syndromes, and being active in the prevention of life-threatening endocrine complications (i.e., carcinoid crisis). The authors have learned over time that patients with valvular disease are not good candidates for surgery. These patients develop right-sided heart failure with an increase in the central venous pressure. This condition can result in massive hemorrhage during the liver resection because of the difficulty in controlling backbleeding from the hepatic veins [26]. Correction of valvular disease is warranted for safe liver resection. The authors' current policy is to rule out valvular disease in every patient with carcinoid tumors and repair the valves prior to hepatic resection when indicated [27]. This policy clearly has decreased the complication rate. Even though liver transplantation seems to be very attractive as a means of eradicating the disease, this has not been common in clinical practice because of the shortage of allografts, and the overall costs and complications of the procedure override its benefits, especially when compared with partial hepatectomy. Current methods to detect the spread of disease that were not readily available in the past, such as MRI and indium-111 pentetreotide (Octreoscan), may expand the applications of transplantation and allow for better selection of candidates. The option of transplantation is still open for improvement and is dependent on organ availability and better staging of the disease. Metastases from neuroendocrine tumors are hypervascular, favoring the application of MRI as the single imaging method; MRI not only evaluates the location and characteristics of the lesions but also determines the relationship with major vessels and bile ducts. Spiral CT scan has been used extensively in the past with acceptable results. Indium-111 pentetreotide functions on the base of somatostatin receptors present in these tumors, but its use has not been established definitely in the work-up of these patients. Perhaps the best use of indium-111 pentetreotide is in the evaluation of disease beyond the primary and liver locations, including bone metastases; its use therefore will likely affect the preoperative work-up of candidates for transplantation [28]. Once the patient has been deemed to have resectable disease by the preoperative work-up, several steps need to be completed prior to surgery to decrease the effect of specific endocrinopathies. For patients with symptoms related to carcinoid tumors, preoperative preparation with 150 to 500 micrograms of somatostatin decreases the chances of carcinoid crisis, which is manifested by hemodynamic instability [29]. The use of this medication intraoperatively should be kept in mind because a carcinoid crisis can occur despite anesthetic premedication. For islet cell tumors, treatment of underlying endocrinopathy has been initiated before referral for surgical treatment in most patients. Surgery is appropriate for patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors for the following two reasons: (1) many of them still have the primary tumor in place and resection should be undertaken to avoid acute complications and (2) the addition of adjunctive ablative therapies to surgical resection accomplishes the control of greater than or equal to 90% of the bulk of the tumor. If preoperative evaluation indicates that less than 90% of the tumor is treatable, surgical therapy is contraindicated. Last, even when complete resections are performed, the recurrence rate for these tumors is extremely high. In practical terms, patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors are seldom cured. The best hope physicians can offer these patients is an extended survival period with minimal endocrine symptoms and decreased requirements of somatostatin analogs.
减瘤治疗对转移性神经内分泌肿瘤肝转移的治疗有效,无论其功能状态如何。在功能性肿瘤中,大多数患者的临床内分泌病变得到缓解,且这种反应通常持续数月。其主要发病率和死亡率不高于主要中心非神经内分泌转移性肿瘤切除的平均并发症发生率;因此,手术结果似乎证明手术干预是合理的。原发肿瘤能够得到控制、肝外转移局限且身体状况良好的患者适合进行切除手术。作者的数据支持上述观点。目前1.2%的死亡率和15%的主要发病率清楚地表明了这种手术方法在这类复杂病例中的成功(54%的患者接受了至少一个肝叶的切除)[9]。95%的患者有症状缓解反应,中位缓解期为45个月,这为大多数患者增加了数月的无瘤生存时间[9]。在本文综述的文献中,超过一半的患者还接受了肝大部切除术,其中40%的患者同时切除了原发肿瘤。这些数据证实,在选定患者中进行切除手术并不比其他转移性肿瘤的切除手术更复杂或更具风险。内分泌病变并未增加该人群的麻醉或手术风险;然而,这些结果是长期管理这些患者、熟悉其临床综合征并积极预防危及生命的内分泌并发症(即类癌危象)的结果。随着时间的推移,作者了解到患有瓣膜病的患者不是手术的合适人选。这些患者会出现右侧心力衰竭,中心静脉压升高。由于难以控制肝静脉的回血,这种情况可能导致肝切除术中大量出血[26]。为了安全地进行肝切除,有必要纠正瓣膜病。作者目前的策略是在每例类癌肿瘤患者中排除瓣膜病,并在必要时在肝切除术前修复瓣膜[27]。这一策略明显降低了并发症发生率。尽管肝移植作为根除疾病的一种手段似乎很有吸引力,但由于同种异体移植物短缺,在临床实践中并不常见,而且该手术的总体成本和并发症超过了其益处,特别是与部分肝切除术相比时。目前过去难以获得的检测疾病扩散的方法,如MRI和铟-111五肽胃泌素(奥曲肽扫描),可能会扩大移植的应用范围,并有助于更好地选择候选者。移植的选择仍有待改进,这取决于器官的可获得性和更好的疾病分期。神经内分泌肿瘤的转移灶血供丰富,有利于将MRI作为单一成像方法应用;MRI不仅可以评估病变的位置和特征,还可以确定其与主要血管和胆管之间的关系。过去螺旋CT扫描已被广泛应用,结果尚可。铟-1-11五肽胃泌素基于这些肿瘤中存在的生长抑素受体发挥作用,但其在这些患者的检查中的应用尚未完全确立。也许铟-111五肽胃泌素的最佳用途是评估原发部位和肝脏以外的疾病,包括骨转移;因此其应用可能会影响移植候选者的术前检查[28]。一旦术前检查认为患者的疾病可切除,在手术前需要完成几个步骤以减轻特定内分泌病变的影响。对于有类癌肿瘤相关症状的患者,术前使用150至500微克生长抑素进行准备可降低类癌危象的发生几率,类癌危象表现为血流动力学不稳定[29]。术中应牢记使用这种药物,因为尽管进行了麻醉前用药,仍可能发生类癌危象。对于胰岛细胞瘤,大多数患者在转诊进行手术治疗之前就已开始对潜在的内分泌病变进行治疗。手术适用于转移性神经内分泌肿瘤患者,原因如下:(1)许多患者的原发肿瘤仍然存在,应进行切除以避免急性并发症;(2)在手术切除的基础上增加辅助消融治疗可控制大于或等于90%的肿瘤体积。如果术前评估表明可治疗的肿瘤小于90%,则禁忌手术治疗。最后,即使进行了完整切除,这些肿瘤的复发率仍然极高。实际上,转移性神经内分泌肿瘤患者很少能被治愈。医生能为这些患者提供的最大希望是延长生存期,尽量减少内分泌症状,并减少生长抑素类似物 的使用需求。