Chan Kwok H, Gu Yao L, Ng Fai, Ng Park S P, Seto Wing H, Sham Jonathan S T, Chua Daniel, Wei William, Chen Yue L, Luk Winsie, Zong Yong S, Ng Mun H
Department of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Int J Cancer. 2003 Jul 10;105(5):706-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11130.
We assessed 5 EBV specific assays for their capacity to effect serologic diagnosis of suspected NPC. The assays were the immunofluorescent assays, VCA IgA and EA IgA, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays specific for EBNA 1 IgA or zta IgG and an EBV DNA assay. Serum samples were taken from 218 symptomatic NPC patients presenting consecutively at a public hospital in Hong Kong, 51 of whom were subsequently diagnosed as having NPC; 4 had EBV-associated lung cancer with similar serology as NPC. The remaining patients included 23 who had other cancers and 140 who had other diseases. Objectives of serodiagnosis under such clinical settings, therefore, are to both exclude and predict a diagnosis of NPC. None of the assays individually can meet both requirements adequately, however. The difficulty was best overcome by combining EBNA 1 IgA and zta IgG. It was shown that 68.3% of the patients gave a confirmed test results, negative or positive, by both tests. A confirmed negative result was associated with a negative predictive value of 99.1%, providing a clear indication to exclude a diagnosis of NPC; a confirmed positive result was associated with a positive predictive value of 86.8%, providing a clear indication to proceed with diagnostic work-up of NPC. The remaining patients gave equivocal test results, being positive for one or the other test, which were associated with a positive predictive value of 43.3% and 24.2%, respectively.
我们评估了5种EBV特异性检测方法对疑似鼻咽癌进行血清学诊断的能力。这些检测方法包括免疫荧光检测法、VCA IgA和EA IgA、针对EBNA 1 IgA或zta IgG的酶联免疫吸附检测法以及一种EBV DNA检测法。血清样本取自香港一家公立医院连续就诊的218例有症状的鼻咽癌患者,其中51例随后被确诊为鼻咽癌;4例患有EBV相关肺癌,其血清学特征与鼻咽癌相似。其余患者包括23例患有其他癌症的患者和140例患有其他疾病的患者。因此,在这种临床情况下血清学诊断的目的是排除和预测鼻咽癌的诊断。然而,没有一种检测方法能单独充分满足这两个要求。将EBNA 1 IgA和zta IgG结合使用能最好地克服这一困难。结果显示,68.3%的患者通过这两种检测方法都得到了确诊的检测结果,无论是阴性还是阳性。确诊为阴性的结果对应的阴性预测值为99.1%,明确提示可排除鼻咽癌诊断;确诊为阳性的结果对应的阳性预测值为86.8%,明确提示应进行鼻咽癌的诊断性检查。其余患者的检测结果不明确,一种检测或另一种检测呈阳性,其对应的阳性预测值分别为43.3%和24.2%。