Suppr超能文献

使用分子印迹聚合物从血浆中提取β-受体阻滞剂的正相和反相固相萃取方法的比较

Comparison of normal and reversed-phase solid phase extraction methods for extraction of beta-blockers from plasma using molecularly imprinted polymers.

作者信息

Martin Paul D, Jones Graeme R, Stringer Frances, Wilson Ian D

机构信息

Dept. of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Mereside, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK SK10 4TG.

出版信息

Analyst. 2003 Apr;128(4):345-50. doi: 10.1039/b211787h.

Abstract

A molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) prepared using propranolol as template, methacrylic acid (MA) and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) was used to develop SPE methods in "reversed-" and normal phase mode for an analogue of propranolol (M47070) with another analogue (M45655) used as an internal standard. The compounds were also extracted in reversed-phase mode onto a non-imprinted polymer. It was necessary to employ a protein precipitation step ahead of MIP-SPE in order to facilitate downstream analysis. High extraction efficiencies and linear calibration ranges were achieved using both reversed-phase (RP) and normal phase (NP) MIP-based methods. Extraction efficiencies were lower on the non-imprinted polymer indicating stronger retention by the MIP. This stronger retention was attributed to selective imprint-based binding by the MIP that was not available for the non-imprinted polymer. Although clean extracts were obtained in both RP and NP modes, low level interference from template-related impurities or degradation products compromised detection of M47070 at low concentrations for the MIP-based methods. This interference made accuracy of the MIP-based methods poorer at low concentrations. The reversed-phase method showed marginally better accuracy and precision than the normal phase method.

摘要

以普萘洛尔为模板、甲基丙烯酸(MA)和乙二醇二甲基丙烯酸酯(EGDMA)制备的分子印迹聚合物(MIP),用于开发反相和正相模式下的固相萃取(SPE)方法,以分析普萘洛尔类似物(M47070),另一种类似物(M45655)用作内标。这些化合物也以反相模式萃取到非印迹聚合物上。为便于下游分析,在MIP-SPE之前有必要采用蛋白质沉淀步骤。基于反相(RP)和正相(NP)MIP的方法均实现了高萃取效率和线性校准范围。在非印迹聚合物上的萃取效率较低,表明MIP的保留更强。这种更强的保留归因于MIP基于选择性印迹的结合,而非印迹聚合物没有这种结合。尽管在反相和正相模式下均获得了干净的提取物,但基于MIP的方法在低浓度下,来自模板相关杂质或降解产物的低水平干扰影响了M47070的检测。这种干扰使得基于MIP的方法在低浓度下的准确性较差。反相方法的准确性和精密度略优于正相方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验