Bavel Jan Van
Catholic University of Leuven.
Popul Stud (Camb). 2003;57(1):55-62. doi: 10.1080/0032472032000061721.
It has been demonstrated for many pre-industrial populations that the age at marriage, or marriage duration, influences age-specific marital fertility but the reason for this remains unclear. Among the several mechanisms that may be responsible, the following are often cited: secondary sterility or increased subfecundity associated with parity; declining coital frequency; the age difference between the spouses; and, importantly, parity-dependent fertility control. If the latter mechanism were partly responsible for the marriage-duration effect in pre-transition populations, it would contradict the concept of the modern fertility transition as the evolution (or revolution) from parity-independent to parity-dependent fertility. The study presented in this paper investigates the relative importance of these alternative explanations. The application of multivariate Poisson regression to the fertility data from two birth cohorts in the Belgian city of Leuven shows that a linearly declining or even concave age-specific fertility pattern, disaggregated by age at marriage, does not imply parity-dependent fertility limitation.
对于许多工业化前的人口而言,已有研究表明结婚年龄或婚姻持续时间会影响特定年龄的婚内生育力,但其原因尚不清楚。在可能导致这种情况的几种机制中,以下几点常被提及:与生育次数相关的继发性不孕或生育力下降;性交频率降低;配偶间的年龄差异;以及重要的是,与生育次数相关的生育控制。如果后一种机制部分导致了转型前人口中婚姻持续时间的影响,那么这将与现代生育转型的概念相矛盾,现代生育转型是指从与生育次数无关到与生育次数相关的生育的演变(或革命)。本文所呈现的研究调查了这些不同解释的相对重要性。对比利时鲁汶市两个出生队列的生育数据应用多元泊松回归分析表明,按结婚年龄分类的特定年龄生育力模式呈线性下降甚至凹形,并不意味着生育受到生育次数的限制。