Lesley Walter S, Chaloupka John C, Weigele John B, Mangla Sundeep, Dogar Mohammad A
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Radiology, Division of Neuro-Interventional Radiology, Iowa City, USA.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 May;24(5):975-81.
Permanent balloon occlusion (PBO) of the carotid artery has been previously shown to be an effective means to treat carotid blowout syndrome (CBS). However, despite the effectiveness of this endovascular technique, concern remains regarding its potential for producing delayed cerebral ischemic complications in 15% to 20% of patients. This significant limitation of carotid PBO led our group to evaluate an alternative management strategy, consisting of endovascular reconstruction of the carotid artery (ERCA) in patients thought to be at particularly high risk for carotid occlusion (ie, provocative balloon test occlusion, angiographic documented incomplete circle of Willis, or contralateral carotid artery occlusion).
We reviewed all cases of CBS referred to our service, in which ERCA was chosen as a management strategy for patients thought to be at high risk for PBO, based on previously defined criteria.
Sixteen carotid blowout events occurred in 12 patients with CBS who were deemed to be at high risk for cerebral ischemic complications, which were managed with ERCA by using a variety of stent devices and techniques. Adjunctive embolization of carotid pseudoaneurysms was performed in five of these patients by using platinum coils or acrylic glue. Hemostasis was achieved in all cases, although one patient with traumatic CBS and three patients with aggressive head and neck cancer-related CBS, required retreatment with ERCA. Recurrent CBS rates were similar to those reported in other studies using PBO. Overall, no treatment-related strokes or deaths occurred.
CBS managed with ERCA can be performed safely and with efficacy of outcomes at least equivalent to those previously reported in association with conventional carotid PBO, therefore representing an excellent alternative endovascular technique for patients who are at increased risk of stroke after PBO.
先前已证明永久性球囊闭塞(PBO)颈动脉是治疗颈动脉破裂综合征(CBS)的有效方法。然而,尽管这种血管内技术有效,但对于其在15%至20%的患者中产生延迟性脑缺血并发症的可能性仍存在担忧。颈动脉PBO的这一显著局限性促使我们团队评估一种替代管理策略,即对被认为颈动脉闭塞风险特别高的患者(即激发性球囊试验闭塞、血管造影记录的Willis环不完整或对侧颈动脉闭塞)进行颈动脉血管内重建(ERCA)。
我们回顾了所有转诊至我院的CBS病例,其中根据先前定义的标准,ERCA被选为被认为PBO风险高的患者的管理策略。
12例CBS患者发生了16次颈动脉破裂事件,这些患者被认为有脑缺血并发症的高风险,通过使用各种支架装置和技术进行ERCA治疗。其中5例患者使用铂线圈或丙烯酸胶对颈动脉假性动脉瘤进行了辅助栓塞。所有病例均实现了止血,尽管1例创伤性CBS患者和3例侵袭性头颈癌相关CBS患者需要再次进行ERCA治疗。复发性CBS发生率与其他使用PBO的研究报告相似。总体而言,未发生与治疗相关的中风或死亡。
采用ERCA治疗CBS可以安全进行,且疗效至少与先前报道的传统颈动脉PBO相当,因此对于PBO后中风风险增加的患者而言,是一种极佳的替代血管内技术。