Quintero Rubén A, Dickinson Jan E, Morales Walter J, Bornick Patricia W, Bermúdez Carlos, Cincotta Robert, Chan Fung Yee, Allen Mary H
Florida Institute for Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, St Joseph's Women's Hospital, 13601 Bruce B. Downs Boulevard, Suite 250, Tampa, FL 33613, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;188(5):1333-40. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.292.
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with twin-twin transfusion syndrome who were treated with either serial amniocentesis or selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels according to disease severity (stage).
Centers that were experienced in the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome were invited to share stage-based perinatal outcome data. All patients met basic standard sonographic criteria for twin-twin transfusion syndrome (polyhydramnios maximum vertical pocket, > or =8 cm; oligohydramnios maximum vertical pocket, < or =2 cm). Gestational age at first treatment was <27 weeks of gestation.
Three centers submitted stage-based data, for a total of 173 patients (serial amniocentesis, 78 patients from all 3 centers) and 95 selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels (1 center). The distribution of patients by stage was similar in the two groups. Successful pregnancy outcome (at least 1 surviving infant) was correlated inversely with stage in the serial amniocentesis but not in the selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels group and was significantly lower in the serial amniocentesis (66.7%) than in the selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels group (83.2%). Neurologic morbidity was related directly to stage in the serial amniocentesis group but not in the selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels group and was significantly higher in the serial amniocentesis (24.4%) than in the selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels (4.2%) group. Intact neurologic survival (at least 1 surviving infant without neurologic morbidity) was significantly lower in the serial amniocentesis group than in the selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessel group (51.3% vs 78.9%), particularly in stage III and stage IV (23.5% vs 72.7% in stage IV). Patients who were treated with selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels were 2.4 times more likely to have at least one survivor than those treated with serial amniocentesis.
Our study suggests a relationship between perinatal morbidity and mortality rates and stage in serial amniocentesis but not in selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessel-treated twin-twin transfusion syndrome patients. These findings could be used to tailor the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. A clinical trial to confirm these results is being organized by our research groups.
本研究旨在比较双胎输血综合征患者根据疾病严重程度(分期)接受系列羊膜腔穿刺术或选择性激光凝固交通血管治疗后的结局。
邀请有双胎输血综合征治疗经验的中心分享基于分期的围产期结局数据。所有患者均符合双胎输血综合征的基本超声标准(羊水过多最大垂直深度,≥8cm;羊水过少最大垂直深度,≤2cm)。首次治疗时的孕周<27周。
三个中心提交了基于分期的数据,共173例患者(系列羊膜腔穿刺术,来自所有三个中心的78例患者)和95例行选择性激光凝固交通血管治疗(1个中心)。两组患者按分期的分布相似。成功妊娠结局(至少1名存活婴儿)在系列羊膜腔穿刺术组中与分期呈负相关,而在选择性激光凝固交通血管治疗组中则无此相关性,且系列羊膜腔穿刺术组(66.7%)显著低于选择性激光凝固交通血管治疗组(83.2%)。神经系统发病率在系列羊膜腔穿刺术组中与分期直接相关,而在选择性激光凝固交通血管治疗组中则无此相关性,且系列羊膜腔穿刺术组(24.4%)显著高于选择性激光凝固交通血管治疗组(4.2%)。系列羊膜腔穿刺术组完整神经系统存活(至少1名存活婴儿且无神经系统疾病)显著低于选择性激光凝固交通血管治疗组(51.3%对78.9%),尤其是在III期和IV期(IV期为23.5%对72.7%)。接受选择性激光凝固交通血管治疗的患者至少有1名存活者的可能性是接受系列羊膜腔穿刺术治疗患者的2.4倍。
我们的研究表明,在系列羊膜腔穿刺术治疗的双胎输血综合征患者中,围产期发病率和死亡率与分期有关,而在选择性激光凝固交通血管治疗的患者中则无此关系。这些发现可用于指导双胎输血综合征的治疗。我们的研究小组正在组织一项临床试验以证实这些结果。