Kerouac James D
Gallagher, Callahan & Gartreee, Concord, NH, USA.
J Biolaw Bus. 2002;5(1):34-43.
This article discusses the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority to regulate home use diagnostics for genetic disorders based on the social effects of the devices in the premarket approval process (PMA). It begins with a discussion of the potential social impacts of home use genetic diagnostics, focusing particularly on the psychological effects of the devices. The article then discusses the FDA's past experience in regulating home use diagnostics for HIV and for drugs of abuse testing under its PMA authority. In approving PMA applications for home tests for HIV and drugs of abuse, the FDA has considered various social effects of the devices and tailored its approval to these considerations. However, the agency did not deny approval because of social considerations. The author argues that the FDA's past experience in approving PMA applications indicates both a willingness to consider social considerations in the PMA process and that the agency may deny a PMA application based on social considerations in appropriate circumstances. The author also argues that the FDA may deny application if the social impacts and other health risks of the device greatly outweigh the therapeutic benefits of the device. For example, in applications involving late onset genetic disorders for which no therapeutic options currently exist, the social risks of the device may be found to outweigh the benefits to health and therefore the FDA may deny a PMA application in these situations.
本文讨论了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)基于家用诊断设备在上市前批准程序(PMA)中的社会影响来监管遗传性疾病家用诊断的权限。文章开篇讨论了家用基因诊断的潜在社会影响,尤其关注这些设备的心理影响。接着,文章论述了FDA过去在依据其PMA权限监管HIV家用诊断和药物滥用检测方面的经验。在批准HIV和药物滥用家用检测的PMA申请时,FDA考虑了这些设备的各种社会影响,并据此调整了批准决定。然而,该机构并未因社会因素而拒绝批准。作者认为,FDA过去批准PMA申请的经验既表明其愿意在PMA过程中考虑社会因素,也表明在适当情况下该机构可能会基于社会因素拒绝PMA申请。作者还认为,如果设备的社会影响和其他健康风险大大超过其治疗益处,FDA可能会拒绝申请。例如,在涉及目前尚无治疗选择的迟发性遗传疾病的申请中,可能会发现该设备的社会风险超过对健康的益处,因此在这些情况下FDA可能会拒绝PMA申请。