Salant Talya, Lauderdale Diane S
Committee on the History of Culture and The Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jul;57(1):71-90. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00300-3.
The number of studies examining how acculturation affects the health of Asian immigrants has increased in recent years. The proliferation of studies reflects the growing size and heterogeneity of Asian immigrant populations in the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. This paper compares various approaches to acculturation within the health literature on Asian immigrants by reviewing the literature in three-health domains (1) mental health (2) physical health and (3) health services use. The review critically examines the conceptualizations and measures of acculturation in these three domains and presents major findings. We observe that measurement difficulties posed by the experiences of heterogeneous Asian groups compound theoretical and disciplinary disparities between acculturation instruments. The extent to which conceptual and methodological critiques of acculturation studies in Hispanic populations apply to studies of Asian populations is also discussed. The critical review thus provides insights into the diverse ways that the relationship between culture and health is measured in this complicated and growing literature.
近年来,研究文化适应如何影响亚洲移民健康的研究数量有所增加。这类研究的增多反映出在美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、新西兰和英国,亚洲移民人口规模不断扩大且日益多样化。本文通过回顾三个健康领域(1)心理健康;(2)身体健康;(3)医疗服务利用方面的文献,比较了健康文献中针对亚洲移民的各种文化适应研究方法。该综述批判性地审视了这三个领域中文化适应的概念化及衡量方式,并呈现了主要研究结果。我们发现,亚洲不同群体的经历所带来的测量困难,加剧了文化适应工具在理论和学科上的差异。本文还讨论了针对西班牙裔人群的文化适应研究中的概念和方法批判在多大程度上适用于亚洲人群的研究。因此,这一批判性综述为在这一复杂且不断发展的文献中衡量文化与健康之间关系的多样方式提供了见解。