Urculo E, Alfaro R, Arrazola M, Rejas G, Proaño J, Igartua J
Servicio de Neurocirugía y Sección de O.R.L. Hospital Donostia. San Sebastián, España.
Neurocirugia (Astur). 2003 Apr;14(2):107-15; discussion 115-6. doi: 10.1016/s1130-1473(03)70546-6.
To completely remove the intracanalicular portion of the acoustic neuroma through the retrosigmoid approach, we must open the posterior wall of the internal auditory canal (IAC). Therefore, drilling the IAC is one of the key steps we need to take in the transmeatal surgical approach. Nevertheless, there are no clear anatomical landmarks to identify structures such as the semicircular canals, the jugular bulb or air cells. The individual anatomical variations and those caused by the tumour itself make preoperative evaluation essential if we wish to avoid complications such as deafness, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, bleeding and air embolism.
We describe here the personal experience of the senior author (EU) in drilling the posterior wall of the IAC, with special reference to the anatomical landmarks and surgical limits in the suboccipital approach to the intracanalicular portion of the acoustic neuromas.
This work is based on anatomical data obtained from drilling human temporal bones obtained from cadavers, along with our experience with 20 patients who were operated on for acoustic neuroma using Samii's technique.
We did not operate on any purely intracanalicular neurinomas using this approach. Two tumors were grade II (up to 20mm in diameter), 12 were grade III and 6 were grade IV. We did not drill far enough in any of these cases to be able to see the fundus of the IAC, which was confirmed by postoperative CT. Despite this, the tumor was considered to be completely removed in 17 cases. There was no mortality and we has no major complications as a result of drilling the IAC such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage or air embolism. we cannot guarantee that hearing loss of postoperative deafness, which were the norm except in one case of grade II, were caused by nervous, ischemic or labyrinthine lesions.
In our material it was not possible to completely expose the IAC fundus using a retrosigmoid approach without injury to labyrinth. The areas in which the risk of secondary complications is greatest when drilling are the inferior wall and the IAC fundus. The medial extension of the suboccipital craniotomy makes drilling the intrameatal tumor exposure easier. There are no intraoperative landmarks to locate the petrous structures while drilling the IAC except for those provided by the surgeon's own experience.
要通过乙状窦后入路完全切除听神经瘤的内耳道部分,我们必须打开内耳道(IAC)的后壁。因此,磨除内耳道是经耳道手术入路中关键步骤之一。然而,没有明确的解剖标志来识别诸如半规管、颈静脉球或气房等结构。个体解剖变异以及肿瘤本身引起的变异使得术前评估至关重要,这样我们才能避免诸如耳聋、脑脊液漏、出血和气栓等并发症。
我们在此描述资深作者(EU)磨除内耳道后壁的个人经验,特别提及枕下入路处理听神经瘤内耳道部分时的解剖标志和手术界限。
本研究基于从尸体获取的人类颞骨磨除所获得的解剖数据,以及我们使用萨米技术对20例听神经瘤患者进行手术的经验。
我们未使用此入路对任何单纯内耳道神经鞘瘤进行手术。2例肿瘤为Ⅱ级(直径达20毫米),12例为Ⅲ级,6例为Ⅳ级。在所有这些病例中,我们都没有磨除到能够看到内耳道底部的程度,术后CT证实了这一点。尽管如此,17例患者的肿瘤被认为已完全切除。没有死亡病例,并且我们没有因磨除内耳道而出现诸如脑脊液漏或气栓等重大并发症。我们无法保证术后耳聋或听力丧失(除1例Ⅱ级病例外这是常见情况)是由神经、缺血或迷路病变引起的。
在我们的资料中,采用乙状窦后入路不可能在不损伤迷路的情况下完全暴露内耳道底部。磨除时继发并发症风险最大的区域是下壁和内耳道底部。枕下开颅术的内侧延伸使磨除暴露内耳道内的肿瘤更容易。在磨除内耳道时,除了外科医生自身经验提供的标志外,没有术中标志来定位岩部结构。