Suppr超能文献

综述文章:口服缓释美沙拉嗪制剂——专利药与仿制药对比

Review article: Oral, modified-release mesalazine formulations--proprietary versus generic.

作者信息

Forbes A, Cartwright A, Marchant S, McIntyre P, Newton M

机构信息

St Mark's Academic Institute, St Mark's Hospital, Northwick Park, Harrow, UK.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 May 15;17(10):1207-14. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01578.x.

Abstract

Products containing mesalazine have been used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease for many years. Many of the oral, modified-release products are reaching the point of patent expiration, and it is expected that several new 'generic' versions will be developed. As mesalazine acts topically, the drug needs to be available at the site of inflammation to be effective. For this reason, the currently available products have been developed with individual formulations so that physicians have a choice when matching the different release profiles to the site and extent of disease. As such, the current guidelines state that oral, delayed-release mesalazine formulations are not interchangeable and should be prescribed by their proprietary (brand) name. The standard regulatory assessment process for generic or 'copy' products, using systemic bioequivalence data, does not appear to be sufficient when evaluating topically acting, oral, modified-release products. We therefore recommend that the regulatory bodies should require that new, oral mesalazine products should be assessed by a combination of dissolution, bioequivalence and (a minimum of one) adequately powered, comparative trial to determine therapeutic equivalence. Of most importance here is that the assessment of new modified-release products is sufficiently rigorous to allow patients and physicians to be confident in their use.

摘要

含美沙拉嗪的产品已用于治疗炎症性肠病多年。许多口服缓释产品即将到期,预计会开发出几种新的“仿制药”版本。由于美沙拉嗪是局部起作用,药物需要在炎症部位起效才有效。因此,目前可用的产品采用了不同的剂型,以便医生在将不同的释放特性与疾病部位和程度相匹配时有更多选择。因此,当前指南指出,口服缓释美沙拉嗪制剂不可互换,应按其商品名(品牌名)开具处方。对于仿制药或“仿制”产品,使用全身生物等效性数据的标准监管评估过程,在评估局部作用的口服缓释产品时似乎并不充分。因此,我们建议监管机构应要求新的口服美沙拉嗪产品通过溶出度、生物等效性以及(至少一项)有足够效力的对比试验来评估,以确定治疗等效性。这里最重要的是,对新的缓释产品的评估要足够严格,以使患者和医生对其使用放心。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验